Down
enlarge
Bracket Hack: (5) Indiana
0:56 | College Basketball
Bracket Hack: (5) Indiana
Jeremy Fuchs
Tuesday March 15th, 2016

As part of its preview of the Sweet 16, SI.com is taking a look at all remaining teams in the field. Adjusted offense and defense statistics—which measure the number of points scored and allowed per 100 possessions—are from kenpom.com and the rankings are relative to the remaining teams in the field. All other advanced stats are also from kenpom.com (unless noted otherwise) and are through March 21​.

Record: 27–7, 12–6 Big Ten
Adjusted offensive/defensive efficiency: 118.9 (6th)/98.0 (13th)
Path to Sweet 16: Beat No. 12 Chattanooga 99-74; beat No. 4 Kentucky 73-67

Impact Player: Yogi Ferrell, senior, guard. Tournament stats: 19.0 ppg, 7.0 apg

MORE: Seth Davis reviews opening weekend & previews the Sweet 16

The Case For: Ferrell, who continues to stake his claim as one of the best players in Hoosiers history, has been superb in the first two games. That's no surprise. But it’s been the ascension of freshman center Thomas Bryant that has turned Indiana into a legitimate national title contender. The highly touted 6'10" big man has been good this year, averaging 11.9 points and 5.7 rebounds per game. But he was utterly dominant down the stretch against Kentucky in the round of 32, scoring 15 of his 19 points in the final eight minutes, grabbing five rebounds and shooting 78% from the line. Bryant's offensive rating is 32nd nationally among players who use at least 20-24% of their team's possessions, according to kenpom.com. His emergence gives the Hoosiers the same dynamic inside-out combination that Sweet 16 foe North Carolina has in 6’1” senior guard Marcus Paige and 6’10” player of the year candidate Brice Johnson. Add in 6’7” junior Troy Williams (13.0 ppg) and 6’4” senior Nick Zeisloft (42.5 percent from three) and it's easy to see why Indiana has improved so much after starting the season 5-3 and losing by 20 points at Duke in early December. 

Yogi Ferrell
Jeff Haynes for Sports Illustrated

The Case Against: There’s a fairly big gap between the Hoosiers' offensive performance (stellar) and their defensive performance (merely above-average). Indiana gives up 49.4% percent effective field goal percentage, per KenPom. It has the 116th ranked three-point defense. It let Kentucky’s Tyler Ulis (27 points) and Jamal Murray (16) score at will. Trying to guard the Tar Heels' relentless offensive attack and keep its bigs off the glass will be a challenge for Indiana, which ranks 124th in offensive rebound percentage against and 103rd in total rebounds.

And while Bryant impressed everybody with his late-game dominance over Kentucky, he’s also been wildly inconsistent in his freshman season. There’s the Bryant who scored 23 points in 27 minutes against Minnesota in January. But there’s also the Bryant who scored just eight against Maryland in the regular season finale on March 6. We know the talent is there for the former five-star, McDonald’s All-American. And we’ve seen how he can change games. But can he do it against the Johnson, as well as 6’9” Kennedy Meeks and 6’8” Isaiah Hicks? That could be a different story, and one that may well determine the outcome.

SI Prediction: Lose to North Carolina in Sweet 16

SI Apps
We've Got Apps Too
Get expert analysis, unrivaled access, and the award-winning storytelling only SI can provide - from Peter King, Tom Verducci, Lee Jenkins, Seth Davis, and more - delivered straight to you, along with up-to-the-minute news and live scores.