Well, essentially so it is with ESPN and sports. ESPN rules the land, the sea and the firmament of sport, and ESPN sees that it is good. What it covers is so often what it owns the rights to -- in almost every major sport. ESPN has multiple channels, a magazine, a radio network and now it's starting local Web sites in many cities to compete on that level.
To be sure, other networks share some rights to the various leagues, but only ESPN is a critical mass. ESPN can make you. For example, it signed a 15-year contract with the Southeastern Conference for more than $2 billion, thereby sending every other conference into a panic mode, fearful that ESPN will make the SEC preeminent, America's conference. It can do that.
In no other significant part of American culture does one media entity enjoy such domination.
The one major prize that has eluded ESPN is the Olympics, but NBC owns rights only through 2012, and as sure as Zeus made little gold medals, ESPN will make a huge run at that, too.
Now I must pause here for a disclaimer: I have taken paychecks from ESPN, and enjoyed working there. ESPN produced a movie I wrote. It even produced a very nice biography about me. Moreover, I have many friends at ESPN whose talent I much admire. I don't come to criticize so much as to just nestle up to the elephant in the room and ask, perhaps, that it act with a wee bit more humility and a lot less self-promotion that befits a juggernaut.
For instance, the network has a very unbecoming habit of subtly claiming it alone uncovers all the news. Typically, a valid report will come out, but hours later, ESPN will declare that it has "confirmed" such-and-such. That kind of tacky stuff.
Or a couple of weeks ago, ESPN initially refused to report the news that was headlined everywhere else, that Pittsburgh's Super Bowl-winning quarterback,
Just suppose that CNN regularly had cutesy commercials for CNN starring