ACC Medical Advisor Explains Decision To Keep Pressing Forward

Bryan Driskell

From the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak there have been mixed messages coming from medical professionals at every level, which has made it extremely difficult to know, or trust, what steps we need to take.

In March, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, advised against healthy people wearing masks.

"The masks are important for someone who’s infected to prevent them from infecting someone else,” Fauci said at the time. “Right now in the United State, people should not be walking around with masks. There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.”

Just days prior to Fauci’s interview with CBS, Vice Admiral Jerome M. Adams, the United States Surgeon General, tweeted that masks were not effective in preventing the general public from catching COVID-19.

Fast forward to August and that message has completely changed, to the point where masks are mandated if you are out in public in some municipalities. Hundreds of doctors advise use of a medicine that is decades old to battle the virus, while other parts of society push back against it and call it dangerous.

So it shouldn’t surprise anyone that college football commissioners and school presidents are coming to different conclusions on what to do about playing football in the fall.

The Big Ten and Pac 12 conferences made the decision to cancel their fall football seasons, with hopes of playing in the spring. Both leagues were adamant that their decision was medically driven, and both made compelling arguments to support their calls.

The ACC (which includes Notre Dame), SEC and Big 12 have all stated they will continue moving forward with the season. All three leagues have also insisted their decision to continue is based on medical advice.

When you have different medical experts advising each league it would make sense that each league is coming to a different conclusion. As we’ve seen at the national level, even listening to one expert can result in advice changing day-to-day. Such is the nature of studying a virus that is still quite new. As we learn more about the virus and its impact on the human body you will see different ways of battling it, and different advice on what you should or shouldn't do.

The ACC is being advised by a group of medical experts that is led by Dr. Cameron Wolfe, a disease specialist at Duke University. Wolfe spoke with The Daily about why he believes the league can continue moving forward with fall football.

“We believe we can mitigate it down to a level that makes everyone safe,” Wolfe said in an interview with The Daily. “Can we safely have two teams meet on the field? I would say yes. Will it be tough? Yes. Will it be expensive and hard and lots of work? For sure. But I do believe you can sufficiently mitigate the risk of bringing COVID onto the football field or into the training room at a level that’s no different than living as a student on campus.”

One thing experts seem to agree on is COVID-19 is going to join the long list of viruses that we must learn to deal with and accept as part of our life.

“The virus isn’t going away,” Wolfe said in the article. “We have to co-exist with COVID. I like that saying because it summarizes a reality that this virus isn’t going anywhere. Whilst it ebbs and flows, we’re not going to see it ebb to zero anytime soon.”

He compared it to other deadly viruses to provide context.

“This is not Ebola,” Wolfe told The Daily. “It doesn’t have the lethality or the infectivity. So, certain mitigation efforts can be incredibly helpful. We’ve seen that in other countries, sadly not in the United States, where good infection control and good regimented management have allowed groups to co-exist with this virus really well.”

Wolfe did not hide from the fact that playing in the fall, or in the spring, or next fall, will require some to accept there are risks involved.

“You have to feel some level of comfortable playing in a non-zero risk environment,” explained Wolfe. “You can’t tell me that running onto a football field is supposed to be a zero-risk environment. Look at all of the regular sporting injuries that we accept as a certain level of risk as part and parcel of football. Now the reality is that we have to accept a little bit of COVID risk to be a part of that.”

The hope is that these medical experts and college administrators are open and honest with their athletes about those risks. At the end of the day, it should be up to the athletes and their families if they want to accept those risks and keep playing. So far, the players in the ACC, SEC and Big 12 have said they want to play, and their leaders are listening to them.

Be sure to stay locked into Irish Breakdown all the time!

Join the Irish Breakdown community!
Subscribe to the Irish Breakdown podcast on iTunes.
Follow me on Twitter: @CoachD178
Follow me on Parler: @BryanDriskell
Like and follow Irish Breakdown on Facebook

Sign up for the FREE Irish Breakdown daily newsletter

Comments (9)
No. 1-1

I just hope the ACC actually follows his advice and doesn't succumb to peer or media pressure.

8 Replies


i just hope ND maintains its independence and refutes the outright politicizing inherent in that pathetic statement. We must live up to our values of protecting the integrity of individuals; this means their health above all else.


oops to clarify. i am criticizing the "medical advisor," not ryno1134

Bryan Driskell
Bryan Driskell


What pathetic statement?


You are criticizing the medical advisor? Why? Because the advisors for the PAC and BIG say the opposite? If you don't think the PAC and BIG are doing this for liability reasons, I got news for you. It has nothing to do with their health. If it was, then why are they going to continue to practice and train as if there is a season? Please don't be blind to all of this.


The medical advisor statement is nothing but a watered down paraphrase of the anti-science sentiment espoused by many. No apologia needed; just admit you are willing to take the calculated risk of hurting people. Nothing in the value system i learned at ND supports this. I just ask the Administration to take a stand that this rationale is wrong. Having said that i apologize for infusing politics here. i don't believe in mixing the two but will address my comments to ND.
i did not know the conferences are allowing practices. Either you cancel the sports or you don't. Where is the NCAA on this?
Really, i'm sorry. Back to football and the great reporting Bryan does.


I wear a mask, FWIW, so take that into account when considering my question: When you say calculated risk, what is the number on that risk? What are the odds that a player in the 18-24 year old range will die of COVID should they get it during practice or a game? That's the scientific info I want to know. Please help me.

Bryan Driskell
Bryan Driskell


It's not anti-science at all. With all due respect, you're allowing your own political views to dictate how you absorb the data.

Regarding calculated risk ... when did football become a sport where risk was absent? You are at risk every time you step on the football field.

And how does playing football put young people at greater risk than going to class, living in the dorms, sharing community bathrooms, going in community eating areas, going to packed classes and working out in the gym?

I would advise you to try as best as you can to remove your political bias and obvious animosity towards the current administration and look at the data for what it is. Compare the current death rate for people under 40 to past flu seasons. Compare the impact of COVID on healthy people under the age of 65 to past flu seasons. Compare side health effects of COVID on people under 60 to past flu seasons.

I've been studying all of this since April when my wife got sick with COVID. I don't give a damn what Trump and his administration did or didn't do, the data is what it is, and this is a subject that is very personal to me. Do you think for one second my politics would cause me to twist or manipulate data for a virus that caused my wife to get sick, or that would put my wife, who will be on the sideline of every game taking photos, in danger?


i am quite confused by your last paragraph. i did not accuse you of doing anything. i have great respect and appreciation for your football knowledge and look forward to continue learning from you.
i have chosen to punt my long response since as i stated several comments ago, i apologize for bringing politics into football. i have always said i do not talk politics in the Stadium or the golf course. i will maintain that position but do want to say that my concerns are not political--i am focused on what my alma mater's position should be as an educational, and particularly a Christian educational institution.
i am curious, however, do teams institute similar quarantine policies for the seasonal flu? i have only ever heard of the infected player sitting out. if that is incorrect i would re-think this whole thing. Do you know?