A Thought From the Past: Baseball Needs Realignment -- And 32 Teams

Tracy Ringolsby

With the alignment MLB created for this season, it has rekindled conversations about future alignment and possible expansion. It brought back thoughts of a proposal I made four years ago -- with radical realilgnment along regional lines.

Ever since the Expos moved from Montreal to Washington in 2005, there has been an ongoing movement in the Canadian city to regain a major league franchise. There has even been talk of support for building a ballpark downtown, which was one of the missing ingredients that led to the Expos’ departure.

In September of 2017, the folks in Portland, Ore., were given hope that they, too, could be home to an expansion team when commissioner Rob Manfred, speaking in Seattle,  mentioned Portland as a potential site for a franchise, and was quoted as saying “a team in the West” would be a part of any expansion.

And there is a legitimate ownership group in Portland that has the necessary financing along with support for a stadium, which would be partially funded by a $150 million grant. Approved by the state of Oregon to help finance a stadium when efforts were underway in 2003 to be the site for the relocation of the Expos (who instead moved to Washington, D.C.), the grant is still available.

There seems to be a building consensus that baseball will soon be headed to a 32-team configuration. It will lead to major realignment and adjustments in schedule, which will allow MLB to address the growing concerns of the union about travel demands and off days.

One proposal would be to geographically restructure into four divisions, which would create a major reduction in travel, particularly for teams on the East Coast and West Coast, and add to the natural rivalries by not just having them as interleague attractions, but rather a part of the regular divisional battles.

Consider four eight-team divisions with the addition of teams in Portland and Montreal:

East: Atlanta, Baltimore, Cincinnati, Miami, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Tampa Bay and Washington.

North: Boston, Cleveland, Detroit, Minnesota, Montreal, both New York franchises and Toronto.

Midwest: Both Chicago franchises, Colorado, Houston, Kansas City, Milwaukee, St. Louis and Texas.

West: Anaheim, Arizona, Los Angeles, Oakland, Portland, San Diego, San Francisco and Seattle.

Key elements of this alignment:

  • A 156-game schedule would include 24 total games against the eight teams in each of the three other divisions—three games against each opponent.
  • The schedule would include 12 games—six home and six road—against each of the seven divisional opponents.
  • The format would provide for an off day every week (such as every Monday or Thursday). The season could start on a weekend, which would offset only one three-game series played the week of the All-Star Game.
  • The 156-game schedule would reduce each team’s slate by six games, but revenue could be made up by a major reduction in travel costs.
  • Fan interest could be maintained by allowing for the four first-place teams in each division to advance to the postseason, and having play-in games against the eight remaining teams with the best records.
  • The winners of the four wild card games would advance to the Division Series, which would feature a wild card team against each division champion.
  • Those four winners would advance to the Championship Series, and the winners of that round would meet in the World Series.
  • That would add postseason product to the broadcast packages and provide postseason hope for 12 of the 32 franchises, which could boost attendance in September, again offsetting any impact from the season being six games shorter.
  • With a day off every week, there would be a regular rest routine, much like prior to expansion when teams would often play Sunday doubleheaders and Monday would be off. It could be used for travel so teams did not have to make long flights, arriving in cities at 3 a.m. or later.
  • And the schedule would drastically reduce travel, while keeping teams in their time zones, except for the Rockies and Twins. They, however, would be playing teams in a time zone an hour earlier, which is less demanding than an hour later, and also provides increased TV ratings because of prime time viewing. The other intra-division teams would have to travel to Colorado or Minnesota just six games per year.
  • All teams would open the season with an inter-division series, and all out-of-division road trips would be two-city trips.
Comments (3)
No. 1-3

Milwaukee and Minnesota should be switched. Milwaukee has less history with its counterparts, and is geographically closer to the eastern teams.


Milwaukee and Minnesota should be switched. Milwaukee has fewer ties considering its history and is closer to the Eastern teams.


I think this idea has great potential. The 2020 regular season is already scheduled more along regional lines due to the pandemic, and I am enjoying more regional rivalry games like the Indians-Reds. However, having lived in the Twin Cities for a while, I don't see the Twins happy with their placement in the North. One thing that has changed since you wrote the original article four years ago is the emergence of a group in Nashville that is serious about an MLB expansion team. If they were to get a team rather than Portland, Colorado could be placed in West, Minnesota in the Midwest, Pittsburgh in the North, and Nashville in the East. Of course, Tampa Bay relocating to Montreal wold leave the door open for both Portland and Nashville to get expansion teams, and then you are back to the original problem, and I just don't see Minnesota going for being placed in the North. Maybe Colorado, as silly as it sounds, should be placed in the East or North since, unlike Minnesota, they have no nearby geographic rivals anyway. It certainly isn't worse than when Atlanta and Cincinnati were in the NL West or Houston and Texas being in the AL West right now.1

Write 'em Cowboy