There are many ways to screw up a basketball team. Sign a mere star at a superstar's pay grade. Acquire players solely on the basis of talent, with no clue how they will fit together. Disrupt a jelling roster or stand pat with one that is at or near its peak without a championship in sight. Hire a coach or general manager whose skills and personality aren't sufficient to address the needs of the franchise. Or just be cursed and unlucky.
Just as surely as some teams have sagely secured the pieces over the summer that will foster or hasten their ascent up the standings, others have shopped unwisely, forestalling momentum and laying the groundwork for more groundwork. Here's one person's opinion of the 10 worst offseason moves so far, in no particular order. In each case, I'd be happy to be proved wrong -- better teams make for more enjoyable competition.
The Knicks obviously hoped the early agreement with Stoudemire -- his deal was announced on July 5, three days before it could become official -- would cajole
Yes, keep hope alive, but let's look at the $100 million bird the Knicks have in hand. Stoudemire's justified reputation as the game's most unstoppable force going to the basket on the pick-and-roll was accomplished with the magician
Health is another concern. Stoudemire, one of the NBA's quintessential leapers, has had microfracture surgery and wears goggles to protect a repaired retina that is always vulnerable to a career-ending jolt. Then there is the matter of attitude. Stoudemire was occasionally thin-skinned about criticism in Phoenix and may have trouble handling the media pressure cooker in New York. It also remains to be seen whether he retains his belated commitment to defense, which made him one of the NBA's best all-around players in the second half of last season, but has otherwise been a glaring weakness. Put simply, more will be asked of him than ever before, yet the supporting cast is the weakest of his career. That's not a recipe for success.
Just 23, Johnson has intriguing potential. The 6-foot-9 power forward was one of the Raptors' few quality defenders last season -- according to 82games.com, Toronto's opponents scored eight fewer points per 100 possessions
And that's the rub: The Raptors are gambling a lot of money on a player with a limited sample size who doesn't seem like a great fit in terms of their needs. More specifically, Johnson has "played" five NBA seasons, but languished on the bench early in the tenure with Detroit and has just 3,291 career minutes -- the equivalent of slightly more than one season for a solid NBA starter. While he plays the same position as the departed
Scant experience and the prospect of an undersized frontcourt with Johnson and Bargnani make giving Johnson a healthy raise and a long deal seem overly pricey. Didn't the Raptors learn their lesson overpaying
This is a spectacularly dumb move by Atlanta. Less than three months ago, Johnson was booed off his home court after "helping" the Hawks suffer the most lopsided four-game sweep in NBA history (to Orlando, by an average margin of more than 25 points per game). Disappearing as a positive force when the games mattered most, Johnson shot just 30 percent and averaged 12.8 points during the series while delivering fewer assists and committing more turnovers than he did in the regular season. He also had the temerity to criticize Hawks fans for booing the team during a 30-point home loss in Game 3 -- earlier in the season, he had complained about the lack of enthusiasm and atmosphere for basketball in Atlanta.
After a fifth straight year of regular-season improvement, the Hawks had struggled to defeat a vastly inferior Bucks team (minus star
In response, Atlanta signed Johnson to the most expensive contract of the summer, a deal that will become more onerous with each passing season. Defenders of the move claim the Hawks couldn't afford the dramatic setback of Johnson's departure after their slow but steady climb from the depths of a 13-win season in 2004-05. But what was really at stake here? Johnson and Atlanta's fan base already have a relationship that is both fractious and indifferent (the 53-win team finished 18th in attendance last season), and the signing merely creates a more expensive status quo while hindering chances for significant future upgrades. At 29, Johnson is already well into his prime; it is almost certain that his first five years with the Hawks have been more productive than what he can generate in his next six.
Meanwhile, as the Heat and Bulls get better and the Magic and Celtics remain formidable, the Hawks have to hope that last year's shameful pratfall was all departed coach
Many people seem really excited about Milwaukee's offseason moves. But my view is that having both Maggette and Salmons shows an unhealthy preference for ball hogs over ball hounds. Re-signing Salmons alone would have been OK. Maggette, on his own, is not as good a fit on this roster as Salmons. But signing both could disrupt the defensive synergy that
Maggette is a scoring machine who gets to the free-throw line as well as any wing player in the NBA, a Bucks weakness last season. He averaged 19.8 points by shooting 51.6 percent from the field and 83.5 percent on an eye-opening 7.9 free-throw attempts per game for Golden State last season. But, according to 82games.com, this did not translate into success for the Warriors. Maggette played nearly half of his team's minutes, and during that time,
Maggette hurts his team two ways: no ball movement and no defense. On a Warriors team of chuckers, he ranked behind only guard
The crystal ball shows Maggette bouncing in and out of Skiles' doghouse because of indifferent defense, while passing becomes a secondary pursuit of Milwaukee's offense. Jennings is a ball-centric operator, having averaged 14.8 shots despite his 37.1 percent accuracy as a rookie. That tied him for the team lead in shot frequency with Salmons. Having Salmons and Maggette (owed about $31 million over the next three years) on the floor at the same time is corrosively redundant, potentially robbing minutes from such glue guys as
After O'Neal shot 9-of-44 from the field (20.5 percent) and was outplayed by the Celtics' big men in Miami's first-round playoff loss last season, Boston GM
Not quite as horrible as the Joe Johnson deal -- Gay is five years younger and has a shorter, less expensive contract. But the Grizzlies are still paying max money for a restricted free agent whose outside offers could have been matched, and Gay is still a long way from superstar status. And what does this do to the
Del Negro did a credible job developing the Bulls' young core of players in his two seasons in Chicago. But his playbook is limited, and if he flips the keys to the offense to
A handful of prominent basketball pundits have developed a mob mentality over the supposed incompetence of Timberwolves president
That said, Kahn was bidding against himself when he gave Milicic $20 million over four years (although the last year isn't guaranteed), and should be wary of the ripple effect of also signing Pekovic, another big man who has played well in Europe. Signing Milicic and Pekovic is a concession that time and money were wasted on one of last year's free-agent signings, center-forward
There is a very low potential for stardom among players who are extraordinarily athletic but continue to demonstrate limited production and court IQ even after being in the league for a few years. That's Thomas' profile right now. The four-year veteran is a low-post jumping jack with a career shooting percentage of 45.0, and he's an occasional impact player on defense who just as often gets in foul trouble and turns the ball over. Charlotte, a team with a solid defense but in need of scoring, just gave him $40 million. The good news is that he is only 23.
With starting point guard