The Ravens seem somewhat reluctant to pay Thomas what he is probably worth on the free-agent market. To use the franchise tag, they'd have to pay the versatile Pro Bowl linebacker $7.2 million next season.
2 of 5Simon Bruty/SI
The Seahawks have a history of using their franchise tag and may do so again because they don't want to lose one of the NFL's most reliable kickers. They might be able to ink Brown to a long-term deal before having to place a franchise tag on him. But placing a tag on a kicker isn't very costly anyway, so it's not a bad alternative for Seattle.
3 of 5Don Juan Moore/WireImage.com
In another year, Grant likely wouldn't get the franchise tag, but with the salary cap rising, the Saints may use it on the five-year veteran. Grant, who had six sacks last season, would cost New Orleans $8.6 million if it uses the franchise tag on him.
4 of 5Brian Killian/WireImage.com
The Lions reportedly can use the franchise tag on Redding as a defensive tackle, even though he has played defensive end as well. That means about $2 million less for Redding next season. Redding, who is just 26, had eight sacks last year.
5 of 5Bill Frakes/SI
Most people believe the Falcons will let Kerney test the free-agency waters in March, because the defensive end tag is high and the Falcons don't have much cap room. But they could surprise everyone and try to wrap up the 30-year-old defensive end.
You May Like
Sign Up for our Newsletter
Don't get stuck on the sidelines! Sign up to get exclusives, daily highlights, analysis and more—delivered right to your inbox!