Search

It Didn't Come Easily Batting tees and 3,000 stances got Ripken to his milestone

April 24, 2000
April 24, 2000

Table of Contents
April 24, 2000

Pro Basketball

It Didn't Come Easily Batting tees and 3,000 stances got Ripken to his milestone

Cal Ripken Jr. never has looked pretty with a bat in his hands.
His swing calls to mind the swat of a weekend carnivalgoer
wielding the heavy mallet at the Test Your Strength attraction:
Hit the bell and win a prize! Ripken clubs the ball. That he does
so from a variety of odd stances reduces his aesthetic quotient.
"I've always thought Cal is the best player you'll ever see who
if you saw him only for one day, would make you say, 'What's the
big deal?'" says Texas Rangers manager Johnny Oates, who was
Ripken's skipper on the Orioles from 1991 to '94.

This is an article from the April 24, 2000 issue Original Layout

As Ripken passes through the velvet ropes of the 3,000-hit club,
he belongs to no popular genus of batter. He's not a high-average
hitter, a power hitter or a hitter who reaches base often. Only
Lou Brock (.343) and Robin Yount had a worse on-base percentage
(.342) among the 24 men with 3,000 hits than Ripken's .344
through Sunday. Tony Gwynn, who is usually thought of as a
singles hitter, has a better career slugging percentage (.459)
than Ripken's .451. The sum of those percentages, often referred
to as production, ranks Ripken, at .795, below every 3,000-hit
member except Brock (.753), whose game was speed; Yount (.772),
whose statistical profile somewhat resembles Ripken's; and Pete
Rose (.784), a singles machine. After only four full years in the
majors, the Seattle Mariners' Alex Rodriguez--as a big (6'3",
210-pound) shortstop the next-generation Ripken--has more
30-home-run seasons, more 100-run seasons and just as many
200-hit seasons as Ripken has in 19.

The beauty of Ripken, like sunrises and multivitamins, is that of
an everyday phenomenon often overlooked. The tenacity that fueled
his consecutive-game streak has been equally evident in batting
cages. "Cal works to hit," Oates says. If Ripken has had one
stance for every hit (only a slight exaggeration), then all 3,000
stances have had a purpose. Whim isn't in the Ripken dictionary.
One of his favorite slump-busting drills is to put a batting tee
on home plate in an empty stadium about five hours before a game
and whack about 10 dozen baseballs, many of which fly out of the
park--an extremely difficult feat with a ball that's not pitched.
Most players hit into a net when they use a tee. "I want to see
how the ball carries," Ripken explains.

For pitchers, the book on Ripken is in constant rewrite. What
stance is he using this week? Which pitches is he driving this
series? Two years ago he contorted his body into a hunched
batting stance to compensate for a painful back injury. He still
hit .271.

"He adjusts as well as anybody in the game," says New York
Yankees righthander David Cone. "One time you may think you can
get him down and in, and he'll drop the bat head straight down on
[the pitch] and pull it. The next time you'll go away, thinking
he's looking inside, and he'll reach out and just turn his wrists
over and hook it out of the ballpark. He's the master of making
adjustments."

"He reminds me of Yaz, especially late in his career," Yankees
manager Joe Torre says, recalling Carl Yastrzemski, another
player who had 3,000 hits. "Yaz would constantly change his
stance and find a way to beat you. Same with Cal. He gives you a
little something different every time."

The .278 career batting average, like a one-game sample of
Ripken, doesn't properly define him. "The batting average would
be higher if he'd taken proper rest," Torre says. "Playing all
those games took a toll. When you play hurt and play tired, your
batting average will suffer."

So go ahead. Calibrate Ripken if you will. But be careful with
your math as you arrive at the sum of a devoted career. This is
one equation in which 2,632 is greater than 3,000.

--Tom Verducci

COLOR PHOTO: AL TIELEMANS