Search

Uh-Oh, Canada A weak Canadian dollar and public unwillingness to cater to owners' bottom lines is driving teams south

June 21, 2004
June 21, 2004

Table of Contents
June 21, 2004

Departments

Uh-Oh, Canada A weak Canadian dollar and public unwillingness to cater to owners' bottom lines is driving teams south

There was something almost allegorical about arrivistes from the
Sun Belt (the Tampa Bay Lightning) beating stalwarts from Alberta
(the Calgary Flames) to win the Stanley Cup this month. When
Canadian teams compete in American leagues these days, they
seldom come out ahead. Since 1994 three professional franchises
have made like Canada geese and migrated south: the Quebec
Nordiques (to Colorado), the Winnipeg Jets (to Phoenix) and the
Vancouver Grizzlies (to Memphis). And by 2005 the Montreal Expos
will likely have moved to ... somewhere in the U.S. "Canadians
love sports," says Brian Burke, until recently president of the
Vancouver Canucks, "but their teams just can't compete under
these conditions."

This is an article from the June 21, 2004 issue Original Layout

The most onerous condition is the currency exchange rate.
Canadian franchises pay athletes in U.S. dollars but take in most
of their revenues in Canadian dollars. When the Canadian dollar
is worth 73 U.S. cents, as it was at the close of trading last
week, it's tough to compete. When it's worth 62 cents, as it was
as recently as last summer, competing is almost impossible.
Toronto Blue Jays president and CEO Paul Godfrey attributes 60%
of his team's losses ($70 million over the last two years) to the
currency gap. "Assuming the payroll is $50 million," he says,
"for every cent the Canadian dollar falls, it costs us $400,000.
That kills us."

Cultural attitudes about sports also work against Canadian teams.
U.S. franchises have become adept at obtaining--extorting?--tax
breaks and public funds to build venues. That concept is, well,
foreign to Canadians. Not only do teams there have to pay for
construction of their own facilities (the Canucks pay $10 million
a year to service the debt on the arena they built in 1995), but
they are also taxed at a higher rate than their U.S. rivals. "The
[government's] attitude is, Rich players and rich owners, a pox
on their homes," says Godfrey. "We pay more tax on our ticket
sales than [promoters of] other entertainment events [10% versus
8%]. We even have to pay tax on the free tickets distributed to
players' wives."

There is some reason for optimism in Canada. In 1999 NHL owners
successfully lobbied for the Canadian Currency Assistance Plan,
which helps the franchises defray some of their losses. Five of
the country's six NHL teams made the playoffs, suggesting that
savvy management can overcome financial constraints. The teams'
success also augurs well for sponsorship dollars next season
(provided there is a next season). What's more, several provinces
recently voted to use public money to build junior hockey rinks
as well as stadiums for Canadian Football League teams.

Now, says Burke, it's time to extend that attitude to the
country's major pro franchises. "It's clear," he says, "that
long-term viability depends on it." --L.J.W.

COLOR PHOTO: SPORTSCHROME EX CHANGE Jose Vidro and his mates in Montreal will soon be thefourth team to leave Canada since 1994.