Search

Win-Lose at the Draw

Dec. 02, 2013
Dec. 02, 2013

Table of Contents
Dec. 2, 2013

SI.com
LEADING OFF
THE MAIL
The MMQB
  • Why do you doubt Tony Romo? Is it because he's a choker? (Statistically, he's not.) Because he lacks Peyton's public passion? (Eye roll.) Because he doesn't have rings? (Is that really his fault?) The Cowboys' quarterback has stepped from obscurity to the brightest spotlight—and he can make you think twice about what you expect from the position

  • AFTER A HIGHLY SUCCESSFUL CAREER ON THE FIELD, MATT MILLEN SET RECORDS FOR INEPTITUDE IN SEVEN-PLUS SEASONS AS THE LIONS' GENERAL MANAGER. BUT EVEN AS HIS NAME BECAME A PUNCH LINE, HIS SELF-ESTEEM NEVER SUFFERED

COLLEGE FOOTBALL
  • AFTER USC AND FLORIDA ATLANTIC LOST THEIR COACHES, THE REPLACEMENTS—ED ORGERON AND BRIAN WRIGHT—LOOSENED THE REINS. THE RESULT HAS BEEN SIDESPLITTING SUCCESS, WITH COOKIES

WINTER OLYMPICS
THE SHOT
  • THE VIDEO OF KHALIL EDNEY'S LAST-SECOND BASKET WENT VIRAL NOT JUST BECAUSE IT WON A HIGH SCHOOL PLAYOFF GAME, BUT ALSO BECAUSE IT SHOWED THAT GOOD THINGS COME TO THOSE WHO PERSEVERE

Departments

Win-Lose at the Draw

FIFA will conduct the 2014 World Cup draw on Dec. 6 in Bahia, Brazil. The U.S. team, despite a stellar qualifying campaign, isn't seeded. It will share a first-round group with three other countries. The best-case scenario for Jürgen Klinsmann's squad won't be easy. The worst case is brutal

BEST CASE

This is an article from the Dec. 2, 2013 issue

SWITZERLAND

Least intimidating of the eight seeded teams, the Swiss are solid but lack star power or a World Cup pedigree.

BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA

The U.S. must play an unseeded European team, so why not a World Cup debutant that it beat 4--3 on American soil in August?

ALGERIA

The Fennec Foxes are arguably the weakest of the five African entrants and lost to the U.S. at the '10 World Cup in South Africa.

ALLTIME RECORD VS. GROUP: 3-3-3

WORST CASE

NETHERLANDS

The skillful Dutch ('10 runners-up) barely missed out on a seed but will be among the favorites. They went 9-0-1 in qualifying.

BRAZIL

The five-time champs haven't lost a competitive match at home since 1975. They served warning with this summer's 3--0 rout of Spain in Rio.

FRANCE

Another squad whose ranking belies its talent, Les Bleus reached two of the past four World Cup finals. They'll be eager to atone for failure in '10.

ALLTIME RECORD VS. GROUP: 1-23-0

The Americans' outlook is ominous not only because the field is deep, but also because the pot-driven draw does them no favors. Even though they're No. 13 in the world, there's nothing to prevent them from being grouped with three higher-ranked teams; it's also less likely for them to get an easy first-round foe because they're traditionally dispersed from a weak pot that includes the four Asian sides. The alternative? If FIFA used its rankings to create eight groups in the way that the NCAA tournament creates four regions (with minor tweaks to avoid geo-clustering, e.g., no more than two European teams in a group), those would emerge quite balanced. Such a setup would prohibit rematches in the round of 16 and keep the top eight teams apart until the quarters. Here's how that would play out, with higher-ranked teams advancing:

A

1 SPAIN (1)

2 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA (16)

3 IVORY COAST (17)

4 AUSTRALIA (57)

A1

G2

B

1 GERMANY (2)

2 GREECE (15)

3 ECUADOR (22)

4 CAMEROON (59)

H1

B2

C

1 ARGENTINA (3)

2 PORTUGAL (14)

3 CROATIA (18)

4 SOUTH KOREA (56)

E1

C2

D

1 COLOMBIA (4)

2 U.S.A. (13)

3 RUSSIA (19)

4 IRAN (49)

D1

F2

E

1 BELGIUM (5)

2 CHILE (12)

3 FRANCE (21)

4 JAPAN (44)

G1

A2

F

1 URUGUAY (6)

2 ENGLAND (10)

3 GHANA (23)

4 HONDURAS (34)

B1

H2

G

1 SWITZERLAND (7)

2 BRAZIL (11)

3 MEXICO (24)

4 NIGERIA (33)

C1

E2

H

1 NETHERLANDS (8)

2 ITALY (9)

3 COSTA RICA (31)

4 ALGERIA (32)

F1

D2

*Rankings in parentheses

PHOTOFERNANDO BIZERRA JR/EFE/SIPA USAPHOTOTHIRTY SEVEN PHOTOS