F1 News: Toto Wolff Reveals He Was Behind Ferrari's Vegas Penalty - "For The Benefit Of The Team"
Mercedes CEO and team principal Toto Wolff staunchly defended his decision to veto a penalty waiver for Ferrari in Las Vegas. This move may have played a crucial role in Mercedes' narrow victory over Ferrari in the constructors' championship.
Key Takeaways:
- Mercedes, under Toto Wolff's guidance, reportedly refused to allow Ferrari a penalty waiver after Carlos Sainz's mishap in Las Vegas.
- Sainz's unfortunate encounter with a drain cover led to an engine penalty consisting of 10 grid places for the race down the iconic Las Vegas Strip.
- Wolff articulated his reasoning, highlighting the importance of adhering to regulations and the responsibility he holds towards the 2,500 team members at Mercedes.
In the heat of a tightly contested battle for second place in the constructors' championship, Toto Wolff, found himself in a position where a critical decision had to be made. After Ferrari's Carlos Sainz suffered a mishap, damaging his car by hitting a drain cover, he faced an engine penalty for the race on the Saturday night.
This incident opened a door for Mercedes to gain an edge in the championship race. Amidst rumours and accusations, Wolff confirmed that Mercedes was indeed the team that shot down a penalty waiver for Ferrari. This decision not only affected Ferrari's performance but also had a direct impact on the championship standings.
Wolff, in an interview with RacingNews365, defended his decision. He explained:
"As a team principal for a rival team that is fighting for P2, I need to look at the regulations and at the full scope of possible actions of ourselves in order to finish P2 in the championship.
"If the regulation says so, I need to act for the benefit of the team and 2,500 people.
"If we lost the championship by five points because I have acted in sporting fairness, and the rules would have allowed me to actually penalise the car, I need to do this. Every other team principal will do it as much as it's unfair.
"I need to decide, is it unfair for a rival driver? It is. But I have 2,500 people that I'm literally responsible for - that pay mortgages and school fees. So, it's a no-brainer."