What Went Wrong for Arizona Women’s Basketball in Loss to Utah

Arizona women’s basketball came painfully close to opening Big 12 play with a statement win, but a 63–62 loss to Utah ultimately exposed several areas that swung the game despite an impressive second-half comeback.
Mar 23, 2024; Storrs, Connecticut, USA; Arizona Wildcats guard Skylar Jones (4) called for a foul against the Syracuse Orange in the second half at Harry A. Gampel Pavilion. Mandatory Credit: David Butler II-Imagn Images
Mar 23, 2024; Storrs, Connecticut, USA; Arizona Wildcats guard Skylar Jones (4) called for a foul against the Syracuse Orange in the second half at Harry A. Gampel Pavilion. Mandatory Credit: David Butler II-Imagn Images | David Butler II-Imagn Images

In this story:


Three Things That Went Wrong for Arizona Women’s Basketball in Loss to Utah

While the Wildcats showed toughness and resilience, three critical issues proved costly in a one-point defeat.

1. The Second Quarter Collapse

Oct 21, 2025; Kansas City, MO, USA; Arizona head coach Becky Burke speaks to media during Big 12 Womenís Basketball Media Day at T-Mobile Center. Mandatory Credit: Sophia Scheller-Imagn Images | Sophia Scheller-Imagn Images

The most glaring issue for Arizona was a disastrous second quarter, which turned what had been a competitive start into a steep uphill battle. After leading 19–15 at the end of the first quarter, Arizona was outscored 24–4 in the second, creating a 16-point halftime deficit.

That single quarter accounted for nearly 40 percent of Utah’s total scoring, while Arizona managed just two made field goals in the period. The Wildcats shot under 15 percent from the floor in the second quarter and committed multiple empty possessions that allowed Utah to build momentum. Even more damaging, Arizona failed to score for long stretches, allowing Utah to go on extended runs without resistance.

Scenes from the women's basketball game between Vanderbilt and Arizona at Acrisure Arena in Palm Desert, Calif., on Tuesday, November 26, 2024. | Taya Gray/The Desert Sun / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Outside of that quarter, Arizona actually outscored Utah across the remaining three periods (19–14, 20–19, and 19–10). The numbers clearly show that a single 10-minute lapse was the difference between a win and a loss.

2. Rebounding Disparity

Another major factor was Arizona’s struggle on the glass. Utah dominated the rebounding battle 45–31, including a significant edge on the defensive boards that limited Arizona’s second-chance opportunities.

Arizona finished with just six offensive rebounds, which prevented the Wildcats from generating extra possessions in a low-scoring game. Utah’s ability to control the boards also allowed them to dictate tempo and limit Arizona’s transition chances, especially in the first half.

Mar 23, 2024; Storrs, Connecticut, USA; Arizona Wildcats head coach Adia Barnes with her team during a break in the action as they take on the Syracuse Orange at Harry A. Gampel Pavilion. Mandatory Credit: David Butler II-Imagn Images | David Butler II-Imagn Images

The rebounding gap was particularly impactful late in the game, as Utah secured crucial defensive rebounds in the final minutes, denying Arizona additional chances to take the lead. In a one-point game, the 14-rebound deficit loomed large.

3. Turnovers and Missed Margins for Error

Arizona’s margin for error was slim throughout the game, and turnovers played a quiet but important role in the outcome. The Wildcats committed 15 turnovers, several of which came during the second-quarter drought and directly led to Utah points.

Mar 23, 2024; Storrs, Connecticut, USA; Syracuse Orange guard Alaina Rice (25) hits her head on the court against Arizona Wildcats in the second half at Harry A. Gampel Pavilion. Mandatory Credit: David Butler II-Imagn Images | David Butler II-Imagn Images

While Arizona forced 11 Utah turnovers, they were unable to fully capitalize in transition, finishing with limited points off turnovers compared to their season average. The Wildcats’ offense relied heavily on efficiency, but missed opportunities, including rushed possessions and late-clock shots, prevented them from fully erasing the deficit.

Additionally, Arizona struggled to get to the free-throw line consistently. While Utah didn’t shoot a high volume of free throws either, the Wildcats missed chances to add easy points in a game where every possession mattered. Arizona shot just 37.3 percent from the field, and even with a strong 57 percent shooting mark from three, the overall inefficiency hurt.

Final Takeaway

Mar 23, 2024; Storrs, Connecticut, USA; Arizona Wildcats guard Skylar Jones (4) shoots against the Syracuse Orange in the first half at Harry A. Gampel Pavilion. Mandatory Credit: David Butler II-Imagn Images | David Butler II-Imagn Images

Arizona did many things well, holding Utah to 63 points, dominating the fourth quarter 19–10, and nearly completing a double-digit comeback. However, the second-quarter collapse, rebounding deficit, and costly turnovers proved decisive.

In a 40-minute game, one bad stretch can outweigh three strong ones, and that reality defined Arizona’s Big 12 opener. If the Wildcats clean up those areas, the statistical evidence suggests they are capable of competing and winning against upper-tier conference opponents moving forward.

What areas do you think Arizona has excelled at through the season so far? Let us know by commenting on our Facebook page. Also, be sure to follow @NateMartTSports on X for updates on all things Arizona Wildcats.


Published
Matthew Coury
MATTHEW T. COURY

Matthew is a recent graduate of Michigan State with a bachelor's degree in sports journalism and a minor in sports business management, with a love for all sports.

Share on XFollow MatthewCouryMSU