Like Death, Taxes, You Can Count on National Media Saying Clemson Does Not Belong

Despite being 8-0, having three wins over current ranked opponents, a lot in national media think the Tigers are overrated
Ken Ruinard / USA TODAY Sports

In this story:


In the preseason, all we heard, from just about everyone, is that NC State and Wake Forest were serious contenders for the ACC’s Atlantic Division Championship. And it was true.

If Clemson wanted to improve on its “disappointing” 10-3 season from 2021, they would have to knock off these two veteran teams that have two of the best and most experienced quarterbacks in college football.

Clemson took care of business.

It was not pretty at Wake Forest, as Sam Hartman and his gifted wide receivers diced up a depleted Tigers’ secondary. But the offense came to play and DJ Uiagalelei matched Hartman score for score on the way to a double-overtime victory over what is now a top-10 team.

The next week, Clemson hosted Devin Leary—the media’s pick for ACC Player of the Year—and the Wolfpack. All the Tigers did was harass Leary all night and dominate the lines of scrimmage in a 10-point victory over what was then a top-10 NC State squad.

Clemson (8-0, 6-0 ACC) has since had other challenges. Florida State, who is much improved, gave the Tigers everything they had down in Tallahassee, again with a veteran quarterback running the show in Jordan Travis.

Syracuse, who came into Death Valley 6-0 and ranked 14th, was picked by some to upset Clemson. And the Orange nearly did thanks to four Clemson turnovers. Syracuse also had a veteran quarterback in Garrett Shrader.

But the Tigers, despite giving up a 90-yard scoop-and-score and those four turnovers, rallied with their backup quarterback to take down another challenger.

You might think, having one of the more difficult early-season schedules in the country, playing eight straight weeks without a bye and four of those being on the road, that Clemson would have as much respect as anyone in college football this season. However, that is not the case.

Though everyone has respected the play of Wake Forest, NC State and Syracuse, they do not respect Clemson for beating them, which has me scratching my head.

In all three instances, Clemson was said to be on “upset alert.” In all three instances, there were members of the national media that picked Clemson to lose.

Yet, Clemson won all three games, and they won all three in different ways. In the case of the Syracuse game, a team that turns the football over four times loses nearly 99 percent of the time. Throw a non-offensive touchdown into the equation and it is like 99.9 percent of the time.

But the Tigers found a way to win like they did against Wake Forest and NC State. Sure, it was not always pretty but they won, and they beat good teams.

But the narrative is Clemson is not any good, and despite being the only 8-0 team in the country right now, national pundits are taking their shots.

I have written this column before through the years, but it has never been this bad.

Remember there were those that did not want Clemson to be in the College Football Playoff because Deshaun Watson and Trevor Lawrence were throwing interceptions. Who judges a team off a quarterback throwing interceptions, especially when they are still winning games, and in most cases winning by double digits?

No one before, that I can remember, or no one since has been scrutinized for such.

Despite the fact, Clemson was winning and in Lawrence’s case the Tigers were winning by almost 30 points, the national media was dogging Clemson.

It was so bad in 2019, Clemson beat North Carolina, 21-20, and those who supposedly cover college football kept writing and saying Clemson should not get in the playoff because they had a loss to North Carolina. Yes, this happened on several occasions.

So, the disrespect Clemson is getting now is not anything new.

Meanwhile, while Clemson is being hammered for not playing anyone and barely beating teams like Wake Forest, NC State and Syracuse—three teams that are still ranked, keep in mind—Ohio State is out there being called the greatest team of all time.

Based on what? Talent?

The Buckeyes are talented, do not get me wrong, but who have they played with a pulse? No one. The Big Ten is not tough. The Big Ten, like most years, is overrated.

Plus, of their seven games to this point, six have been played in Columbus. The one road game was at Michigan State, which by the way is a horrible team.

So, I know nothing about Ohio State as a team. The Buckeyes have not faced much adversity other than trailing Notre Dame 14-10 midway through the third quarter in Columbus. That’s it.

Everyone else in the top 10 has faced current-ranked opponents or had one or two challenging road games. In Clemson’s case, it is the only team in the country to beat three teams that are currently in the Associated Press Top 25.

Yet, few even mention Ohio State’s weak schedule.

In 2019, Clemson was being crucified every week despite the fact they beat 12 of the 13 teams through the ACC Championship Game by 14 or more points and 11 of those wins were by 31 or more points.

I am not faulting Ohio State, you play who is in front of you and if you take care of business then that is fine. However, if you are going to dog Clemson for playing a weak schedule in 2019, then you have to stay consistent. The Buckeyes should be under the same microscope Clemson was under, but that has not been the case.

Then there is Joel Klatt who tweeted Clemson would not finish better than third in the SEC East or the Big Ten East.

Really?! Why would Klatt even write that, what is his opinion based on?

I think Clemson has done enough in the past to not warrant a tweet like that one. The Clemson Football Program deserves more respect than that. He would never say something like that about Alabama, Georgia, Ohio State, Michigan or even Notre Dame.

Why attack Clemson? I do not get it.

The national media’s hate for Clemson, and that is what it is, goes all the way back to the Frank Howard days when Howard’s teams won and played in Orange Bowls and Sugar Bowls and all of those big-time events.

They hated on the Tigers then. They hated on the Tigers in the Danny Ford era, and they are hating on them again in the Dabo Swinney era. I guess “Little Ole Clemson” is not supposed to play and beat the big boys, but they have in the past, and the present and they will continue to do it in the future.

I will give the national media credit for something, though. At least they are consistent. Like death and taxes, you can count on the national media saying Clemson does not belong.

Want to join in on the discussion? 100% FREE! Interact with fellow Tiger fans and hear directly from publisher Zach Lentz, deputy editor Brad Senkiw, recruiting analyst Jason Priester and staff writer Will Vandervort on any subject. Click here to become a member of the ALL CLEMSON message board community today!
Get your Tiger tickets from 

SI Tickets HERE
Do us a HUGE favor and like, subscribe and follow us on social media:
►LIKE us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/allclemson
►SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/AllClemson
►FOLLOW All Clemson on Twitter:https://twitter.com/All_Clemson

More on All Clemson: /college/clemson/


Published
Will Vandervort
WILL VANDERVORT

Vandervort brings nearly 25 years of experience as a sportswriter and editor to the All Clemson team. He has worked in the industry since 1997, covering all kinds of sports from the high school ranks to the professional level. The South Carolina native spent the first 12 years of his career in the newspaper industry before moving over to the online side of things in 2009. Vandervort is an award-winning sportswriter and editor and has been a published author three times. His latest book, “Hidden History of Clemson Football” was ranked by Book Authority as one the top 10 college football books for 2021.

Share on XFollow steelerwill