3 Big Concerns for Illinois Basketball Entering the 2026-27 Season

In this story:
Life isn’t all sunshine and rainbows, but it certainly feels that way in Champaign – at least when it comes to Illinois hoops. With Illini Nation still riding the euphoric high of a Final Four run, it’s also looking ahead to a 2026-27 campaign for which it can rightfully hope for even more.
But although Illinois will enter next season every bit a juggernaut and national title contender, coach Brad Underwood doesn't gave to dig far to find areas for improvement. Here are three potential areas of concern for the Illini going into the 2026-27 season:
Three concerns for Illinois basketball in 2026-27

Generating defensive pressure
Last season Illinois hung its hat on keeping opponents off the free-throw line (No. 1 in free-throw rate allowed). But there was a drawback: The Illini’s forced turnover percentage was dead last in the country. Ideally, Illinois can toe the line somewhere in the middle – which, based on recent comments, may be Underwood’s intention for next season.
With the Illini’s size and length, they don’t need to put themselves in fouling positions to create chaos. Sitting in passing lanes, playing with active hands, simply staying aware and anticipating – all of it will allow Illinois to generate more turnovers (blocks count, too).
Zvonimir Ivisic BLOCK 😤 @IlliniMBB
— Big Ten Men's Basketball (@B1GMBBall) January 4, 2026
📺: @BigTenNetwork pic.twitter.com/OUkhnCj4Vi
On top of that, strictly in terms of on-ball pressure, the Illini should ramp it up (which may be tougher without Kylan Boswell). Wing Andrej Stojakovic may embrace that defensive stopper role, but Illinois needs to find a way to apply more defensive pressure on the ball across the board. The only issue: The Illini’s exceptional size translates to less foot speed, which makes it tougher to deploy consistent on-ball pressure.
In scenarios when the Illini have a lead – which was fairly often a season ago and that trend is likely to continue next year – they are perfectly content to sit back, not foul, apply minimal pressure and simply yield nothing easy. But if the Illini ever find themselves in a hole, they’ll be unable to dig themselves out if they don’t at least toy around with aggressive schemes once in a while.
Reliance on production from freshmen

"The Retention" proved successful this offseason. The Illini returned five rotation players, and they also brought in big-time transfer Stefan Vaaks. That totals six projected rotation players. Five-star freshman Quentin Coleman is expected to push that number to seven, meaning Illinois is going to need production out of (at least) one other freshman.
With a high school class of six recruits and given Underwood’s proven eye for talent, the Illini will presumably have a college-ready contributor (if not multiple) not named Coleman in that crew.
But what about Coleman? He may be ultra-polished and a lauded decision-maker, but he’s still a freshman. And it’s not a secret: veteran guards win in March. The Illini are going to need Coleman to provide value, but if he is forced to be their primary backcourt option – which, admittedly, seems unlikely – then the ceiling will remain high, but perhaps not national championship high.
Ball-screen defense

Offense is rarely a problem for Illinois. Dislike the matchup-hunting, iso-ball, no-off-ball-movement approach if you want, but the Illini can score. Underwood, between his scheme and personnel, makes sure of that.
Defensively, though, there are some question marks – one of which is Illinois’ ball-screen defense. At times in 2025-26, the Illini were carved up by opposing ball-handlers in the pick-and-roll (Michigan State’s Jeremy Fears Jr.’s masterpiece leaps to mind).
The main culprit(s): drop coverage and the Ivisic twins. Given their size, and despite Zvonimir boasting slightly better lateral agility than his twin brother Tomislav, the Illini seemingly feel they have no choice but to stick in drop coverage.

Unfortunately, that often leads to one of two results: 1) Guards snake the screen, get an Illini defender on their back and work themselves into the lane before getting off an open floater, spraying to an open teammate for three or tossing a lob to a big man (think Fears or UCLA’s Donovan Dent) or 2) midrange maestros simply step into a comfortable pull-up jumper.
Naturally, Illinois is going to be opposed to switching ball-screen coverages entirely (surely, the Ivisic twins didn’t miraculously stumble into running-back-like agility over the past few months) – which means the Illini must slightly alter their current setup.
Add a dig from the wing, put an emphasis on guards quickly getting through screens or get creative in some capacity – whatever it winds up being, Illinois must implement a few minor tweaks to ensure it isn’t once again heavily vulnerable against ball-screen action.

Primarily covers Illinois football and basketball, and Kansas basketball, with an emphasis on analysis, features and recruiting. Langendorf, a third-generation University of Illinois alum, has been watching Illini basketball and football for as long as he can remember. An advertising student and journalism devotee, he has been writing for On SI since October 2024. He can be followed and reached on X @jglangendorf.
Follow jglangendorf