The NFL’s ‘Concussion’ Problem
Five days before the movie Concussion hits theaters, one of the NFL’s brightest young stars took a running start and launched himself head-first at the earhole of an opponent’s helmet.
This was one of three unnecessary roughness fouls Odell Beckham Jr. received during a loss to Carolina on Sunday afternoon, and on Monday, the 23-year-old receiver was suspended for the Giants’ Week 16 game. The NFL reprimanded Beckham for initiating “forcible contact” with the head of a defenseless player, Carolina cornerback Josh Norman, putting Norman at unnecessary risk for injury. In other words, the very kind of collision that football at all levels is trying to avoid.
“That’s a selfish play, something that as a player you can’t allow to happen,” Norman’s teammate, linebacker Thomas Davis, said after the game. “It probably wasn’t a situation where [an injury] could have happened from it, but at the same time, as players we have to be smarter about not using our helmets to make contact.”
Never has there been more of a spotlight on, and awareness of, the risk of brain injury in America’s Game. Ten years ago, a movie bluntly titled Concussion would most likely never have been made. But on Christmas Day it will be out at theaters across the country. Viewers will take in popcorn, soda and the story of how the degenerative brain disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) was first discovered in deceased NFL players.
Will Smith plays Bennet Omalu, the forensic neuropathologist who performed the autopsy of Hall of Fame Steelers center Mike Webster in 2002 while working for the Allegheny County Coroner’s Office. Webster died at age 50 after experiencing dementia and depression, and Omalu found in his brain the tangles of tau protein consistent with CTE, which had previously been recognized in “punch-drunk” boxers.
It was the first of many diagnoses of CTE in deceased ex-NFLers—now at 87 and counting—which has mushroomed into the cloud that hangs over the NFL today: What are the long-term health risks of the most popular sport in the United States? The movie, recounting real-life events with some creative license, shows Omalu being stonewalled by the NFL as he tries to ring the alarm on the effects of repeated head trauma on players’ health. His character is warned in one scene, “You’re going to war with a corporation that owns a day of the week.”
So now that the NFL’s health and safety crisis has gone Hollywood, what effect will it have? The league’s past history of inaction concerning head trauma was detailed in the book League of Denial, by Steve Fainaru and Mark Fainaru-Wada, and in the subsequent PBS Frontline special in 2013. But now the dangers of the game have been dramatized on the silver screen, with a megawatt actor (Will Smith) and a love story tacked onto the side, more accessible than ever to moms and dads who will make decisions about whether or not their kids will play football.
“We are encouraging players to see it,” says the NFLPA’s Atallah, “as a teaching tool about not-so-ancient history.”
“We’re not focused on a movie, we’re focused on continuing to make progress,” NFL commissioner Roger Goodell told a small group of reporters in his first (though fleeting) comments on Concussion to the press, earlier this month. “We have incredible progress that has been made, not only in rule changes, but also in what we saw today with materials and protection that will prevent these injuries from happening. From protocols that we implemented, research we are doing, coaching changes we have had, in taking certain techniques out of the game. What you are seeing is an incredible amount of progress and real impact.”
Goodell was speaking after a presentation announcing the three winners of the second Head Health Challenge, an open innovation program sponsored by the NFL and GE to invest up to $20 million in new technologies that may be able to better diagnose or prevent traumatic brain injuries. The winners announced that day included an underlayer for synthetic turf to soften blows against the playing surface; a new impact-mitigating helmet designed by the University of Washington; and a tethering system designed by the Army Research Laboratory to reduce violent head whips.
The timing of that event was probably no coincidence, nor was Goodell sitting down with 60 Minutes for a piece on player safety that aired in November. The NFL will never be able to fully outrun its past on this issue, even after agreeing to pay $765 million to settle the lawsuit brought by 4,500 players alleging that the NFL concealed the dangers of head trauma. Now, with a mainstream movie again showcasing that past, the NFL is emphasizing the future.
It’s much smarter for the NFL to embrace the dialogue that will be sparked by the movie and express support for any efforts to make the game safer—which is what the blanket statement the league is issuing to every media outlet in response to the movie essentially does. “We welcome any conversation about player health and safety,” a league spokesperson wrote in an e-mail. “Broader and deeper awareness of these issues will positively impact all athletes.”
The NFL’s athletes are seeing the movie. A spokesperson for Sony Pictures, which made the film, said well over 100 current and former players and their families have seen the movie at screenings across the country. The NFL Players Association showed the movie to its staff last week at its D.C. headquarters, and its local chapters have arranged viewings for groups of retired players, like the one The MMQB attended in Atlanta. On a regularly scheduled conference call with the union’s player reps last week, NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith also encouraged them to see the movie when it comes out.
“We are encouraging players to see it, as a teaching tool for them about the not-so-ancient history of how the league mismanaged a serious health and safety issue, and why it’s crucial for the union to be aggressive on these issues,” says George Atallah, the NFLPA’s executive director of external affairs. “I think that’s where the film has a really strong message. Not that football is dangerous, because we all know playing football comes with risks, but the only way football is going to end is if we continue to deny some of the dangers and don’t try to fix them.”
The Sony spokesperson said, to his knowledge, no one at the league office has seen Concussion in advance of its Christmas Day release. None were invited to screenings, but many employees at 345 Park plan to see the movie after it hits theaters. They should, and they should admit that they have. It would be a bad look to turn a blind eye or try to repress the subject matter covered in the movie—perhaps a lesson learned in 2013, when The New York Times reported that ESPN pulled out of the Frontline project after Goodell expressed his displeasure with the documentary’s direction at a lunch with network executives. The TV special then garnered appeal as the so-called documentary the NFL doesn’t want you to see, a narrative the league has taken care not to play into with this film.
Perhaps that’s why the Concussion filmmakers felt comfortable using real NFL game footage in the film and its TV trailers without consent from the league. Fair use of copyrighted material for storytelling does not generally cover commercial use—this is why the HBO TV series Ballers, for example, used NFL logos in the episodes but scrubbed them from show trailers. But Sony had to figure the NFL wouldn’t take on the PR hit of going after the movie over copyrights.
Concussion director Peter Landesman reached out last fall to Paul Hicks, then the league’s top communications executive, to try to set up a meeting, as originally reported by the Times via correspondence uncovered through the Sony e-mail hack. Landesman never followed through on meeting with Hicks or the league, nor did he send them the screenplay. That works in the favor of both sides, who can say the NFL had no influence on the content. Hicks left the NFL earlier this fall to join the Glover Park Group, where he now provides external P.R. advice to the NFL, including on health and safety matters. (It stands to reason that the league’s strategy for responding to Concussion would fall under that umbrella).
The NFL, like any big business, routinely takes the temperature of fans via surveys and focus groups. Within the last 10 years, those questionnaires have asked fans how they want to see the league address player health and safety. The answers have centered on wanting to see the NFL seek solutions to make the game safer.
There have been 39 rules changes to promote player health and safety in the past five years; the institution of concussion protocols, unaffiliated neurotrauma consultants and injury spotters at games; and an investment of tens of millions of NFL dollars into research and technology devoted to brain injuries. But the work is ongoing, as illuminated earlier this season when Rams quarterback Case Keenum was allowed to stay in the game despite showing signs of being dazed after hitting his head hard on the turf. A few weeks later, NFL Network reported the league plans to impose discipline, whether fines or suspensions, for teams failing to properly follow medical protocol.
A similar example occurred the following week, when Ben Roethlisberger wasn’t checked after taking a tough hit on a Seahawks roughing the passer penalty. After the series ended, though, the Steelers quarterback self-reported concussion-like symptoms to the team’s medical staff. “A cultural change that not only has an impact on the NFL, but all sports,” Goodell said.
“That is extraordinary progress, that we are now focusing on, that player didn’t come out immediately,” Goodell said, “or this player self-reported. … We have to keep raising the bar, and the bar keeps being raised on us. That’s good, because ultimately it is going to lead to, at least in my view, better protocols and better systems, better protection, and advancements. All of that is going to be beneficial for the people who play our games and, I think, all games.”
• IF YOU GIVE A MOUSE A CONCUSSION: Using a novel technique to peer through the skulls of living mice, researchers at the National Institutes of Health in Maryland are observing concussed brains in real time
The NFL’s contributions to head trauma research came under fire on Tuesday, with an ESPN report alleging that the NFL vetoed a plan for a portion of a $30 million research grant, one the NFL had declared would be “unrestricted,” given to the National Institutes of Health in 2012 to be used to fund a Boston University study that aims to diagnose CTE in the living. Right now, the disease can only be detected posthumously, but changing that would be an important step to allow doctors and scientists to better understand the disease and treat patients. The ESPN report alleged that the league had an issue with the leader of the BU group, Robert Stern, who has been critical of the league. The NFL refuted the report, saying that NIH independently decides how to use the funds; The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health also issued a statement saying the NFL was willing to fund the BU study, but that NIH decided to fund that particular project on its own and instead use the NFL funds for a second study on CTE next year.
It’s true that there are two categories of head trauma research that don’t necessarily have the same end game in mind. One is developing better technology to prevent, diagnose and treat concussions, to allow an inherently violent game to be played in a safer way. The other is trying to define the link between football-related head trauma and long-term neurological impact, to quantify exactly what the risk of the game is. Knowing that some former football players have suffered from CTE is one thing; understanding why, how many and what can be done about it is something else entirely.
Concussion reminds the American public why those questions are being asked, and the importance of coming up with answers. Davis, the Panthers’ NFLPA rep, is among the players who plan to see the movie. Earlier in Carolina’s so-far undefeated season, Davis saw his team exercise patience when his linebacker partner, Luke Kuechly, sat out three games after suffering a Week 1 concussion.
“With all the research and all the information that has come out, about CTE and long-term effects from concussions, I don’t think we really needed the movie to shed light on what is going on and what has been going on in the past,” Davis said. “I think the league has taken a better stance, and we’re doing a much better job of holding guys out and allowing guys to get back healthy. And I think that’s very important for guys moving forward, not just throughout the weeks they are playing in the NFL, but for their life, long-term.”
The NFL can’t change its past, but it can change what happens in the future.