For slumping Ortiz, Soriano and Burrell, it's getting late early
One of the toughest decisions for a manager is when to start taking at-bats away from a veteran hitter, particularly when that player is pulling down serious coin. It still may be very early in the season, but it's not too early to foresee painful calls that will have to be made by
The chart at right shows just how bad Ortiz, Soriano and Burrell have been so far this season.
Again, it's too early to make a definitive call on any of them, but the warning signs are ominous. Ortiz, 34, hit .238 last year. Soriano, 34, hit .241 and has missed almost 100 games combined over the past two seasons. Burrell, 33, hit .221 last year. All of them are smack in the crosshairs of the two fastest-growing influences these days in how players are quickly devalued: age and lack of defensive skills.
Moreover, Francona, Piniella and Maddon have the same forces working upon them that lend urgency to making a call on their aging sluggers: They manage contending teams that can't afford to lose ground early to a strong defending division champ, and they have other options already in hand.
Francona, for instance, could give some of the lefty-swinging Ortiz's at-bats to righty
Piniella could give more at-bats to rookie
Each decision also carries unique pressures for the manager to consider. For Francona, Ortiz is a Boston icon and a tremendous clubhouse influence, and the manager risks losing the player and his voice if he gives up on him. For Piniella, the pressure is the reality that the Cubs still have four years and $72 million remaining on Soriano's contract after this year. And for Maddon, it is knowing that the Rays have 13 percent of their payroll tied up in Burrell, who makes $9 million.
Of course, there is one possibility that each manager is rooting for to make his job much easier: that these aging sluggers begin to hit again -- and soon.
On Aug. 17, 2007, the Cubs signed
Uh, mark that down as an 0-for-2. Since signing the contract, Zambrano has pitched like a No. 3 starter and has been appreciably worse than before the extension, pitching to a 4.06 ERA. Where is the growth? On Thursday, Zambrano pitched one of his too-frequent untidy games, lasting just five innings against Milwaukee, but long enough to give up eight hits, walk three batters, throw two wild pitches and log 121 pitches overall. It was the first time in three years that a major league pitcher threw 120 pitches without getting past the fifth inning.
Forget about an ace. As the chart below shows, Zambrano is the third-best pitcher on his own team, providing fewer wins, innings and quality than
Within three days this week, the Orioles, Indians and Blue Jays all drew the smallest crowds in the history of their current ballparks. It was a cold reminder that the halo effect of a beautiful new ballpark, like the smell of a new car, is not a lasting one.
Toronto's Rogers Centre (nee Skydome), which opened in 1989, was an architectural marvel and tourist attraction unto itself. Baltimore's Camden Yards, which opened in 1992, began the retro-ballpark building boom. And Cleveland's Progressive Field (nee Jacobs Field) was the template of how a ballpark could be the economic and emotional engine of a downtown revival.
Back in 1995, even after the ill will of the two-year players' strike, you could have found no better baseball cities than Baltimore, Cleveland and Toronto. They ranked 1-2-3, respectively, in AL attendance. By last season, they had plummeted to 13-9-12, respectively, and this season shared the ignominy of sinking to rock bottom in their ballparks' history in the same week.