Skip to main content

Mailbag: Keys' potential, thoughts on towel rituals and more

MELBOURNE -- Five thoughts from Day 11 at the Australian Open:

• Let’s start by congratulating Serena Williams on yet another stellar late-tournament performance. The No 1 seed beat Madison Keys on Thursday 7-6, 6-2, but don't let the scoreline mislead – it was best 7-6, 6-2 match you will see. Here’s all you need to know about her career. Well, not all you need, but it’s telling: she is 23-3 in Grand Slam semis. It’s safe to say she can rise to the challenge. Unless Maria Sharapova can reverse a decade-long streak, Serena will move up to 19 majors.

Serena defeats Keys, to play for AusOpen title against Sharapova

• We strap ourselves to the mast to avoid the seduction of the hype machine…but it’s so hard not to like Madison Keys and her potential. Her power, her poise and—maybe above all—the indications that she is not a finished product. Again, the recency effect can damn all of us but what a tournament for the 19-year-old, the Kyrgios of the women’s draw.

• In the first semifinal, Sharapova played an orderly, organized match and dispatched Ekatarina Makarova in two non-competitive sets. All credit to Sharapova, but what a shame that Makarova wasn’t able to summon the tennis that enabled her to Simona Halep 48 hours ago.

• A leftover note from Wednesday night, but tip your legionnaires cap to the performance for Novak Djokovic, who pounded Milos Raonic in straight sets. Djokovic is quietly becoming to the Australian Open what Nadal is to the French. Not only did Djokovic win in straight sets—as he has every match this event—but he lost only 12 points on serve. More stats? He won 17 of 18 net approaches. And he won a more than 48 percent of second-set serve return points.

• On happy note from an ocean away: Mardy Fish, out of tennis more much of the past three years, will be back in action at the Dallas Challenger and then Indian Wells. Golf can wait. (Can’t it always?) Fish is 33 years old, but that’s misleading given how little he has played. His absence owes to factors both physical and mental, so it’s great news he appears to have overcome both.

Mailbag

Have a question or comment for Jon? Email him at jon_wertheim@yahoo.com or tweet him @jon_wertheim.

Okay sure we don't have Roger and Rafa but we do have Stan vs. Novak one....more...time! Isn't that what we all really wanted?
‪-- Cainim in North Dakota

We get the trilogy, the third straight year Wawrinka-Djokovic have played in Melbourne. The previous two were five-set classics. Let’s see what they can serve up Friday. That, said check out the head-to-heads.

Mailbag: Nadal's sportsmanship, Bouchard's loss and more from Day 9

Speaking of Nadal's "rituals," what's this about the use of towels?  Did they towel off so often in the "old" days?  I know all the current players like to towel off, but why does Nadal have not just one, but two towels?  I've even noticed that sometimes he has not just one, but two towel boys/girls rushing to him with aid. What say you?
-- Donald Marhefka, Chengdu, China

This is what I love about tennis. A question from China comes after a question from North Dakota. Sometimes I think ballboys and are really cabana boys. Nadal is hardly the only offender, but, there’s a lot of this going on. My favorite: the juniors beckoning for towels. I’m waiting for the court attendants to say, “You’re 14 years old, kid.  A) your sweat glands aren’t fully developed. B) you want a towel? Get it yourself!”

If you had told me 7 of the top 8 men's seeds would make the quarterfinals, Roger Federer would not have been the one seed I would have thought would have been eliminated.
-- J, PDX

Agree. And what if I had told you that Federer’s place was taken by Nick Kyrgios? While we’re here, check out the women’s draw: Four of the top eight women made the quarters. Kvitova’s place was taken by Keys. Makarova took over for Ivanovic, Venus for Radwanska and Cibulkova for Wozniacki.

australian-open-fans3.jpg
australian-open-fans-5672.jpg
australian-open-fans-224864_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-90338.jpg
australian-open-fans--0.jpg
Rose-Byrne.jpg
australian-open-fans-19820_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-6e3d3ad98-0.jpg
australian-open-fans-14_10.jpg
ester-satorova.jpg
australian-open-fans-18a8fd-0.jpg
australian-open-fans-20_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-0028.jpg
australian-open-fans-30_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-32_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-.jpg
australian-open-fans-79b1f24811f7f-0.jpg
australian-open-fans-138.jpg
australian-open-fans-228.jpg
australian-open-fans-312.jpg
australian-open-fans-336_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-350_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-7738_10.jpg
australian-open-fans4.jpg
australian-open-fans-360_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-76286_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-0392_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-93744_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-416_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-0474.jpg
australian-open-fans-520.jpg
australian-open-fans-562.jpg
australian-open-fans-706.jpg
australian-open-fans-720_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-736.jpg
australian-open-fans-802.jpg
australian-open-fans-0828_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-878_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-926_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-946_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-954.jpg
australian-open-fans-970_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-0970_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-1140.jpg
australian-open-fans-1568.jpg
australian-open-fans-1786_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-2000_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-2606.jpg
australian-open-fans-3192_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-3952_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-4748_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-5074.jpg
australian-open-fans-5548.jpg
australian-open-fans-5912_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-6046.jpg
australian-open-fans-8290_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-8324_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-8470_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-9264_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-9674.jpg
australian-open-fans-10220_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-23482_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-24648.jpg
australian-open-fans-24674.jpg
australian-open-fans-24770_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-35540_10.jpg
australian-open-fans-84014.jpg
australian-open-fans-104020.jpg

Should the umpire have given Kyrgios a code violation in the second set tiebreaker, or was he right to ignore the breaking of the racket? I know it didn't affect the end outcome of the set or the match itself, but it would have snowballed into a much bigger issue if Murray were to have lost the match, no? I can only imagine the jeers and catcalls the umpire would have received from the crowd in the RLA if he'd handed Murray the set right then and there! But professionally speaking, do you think he was in the right to let it slide?
-
- Cheers, Sheba

Murray subtly let it be known that he thought it was curious Kyrgios wasn’t penalized. Not sure I agree. Even if it comes at the cost of inconsistency, I think it’s important to imbue the chair umpire with discretion. In this case, Kyrgios is already under tremendous pressure and already losing the match. Giving him a warning for equipment abuse achieves…what exactly? Other than firing up the crowd and giving the kid some motivation. If I’m Murray, I’m actually happy the racket crack went un-remarked upon. Fine him after the match, if you must. But why disrupt the rhythm of the match with some tsk-tsking?

I was thinking about the Q&A in one of your recent mailbags about the possible benefit of players receiving time off during doping bans and essentially using it as an extended offseason.  Let's pretend for a minute that these players indeed benefited from the rest and time-off itself (rather than possible long term effects of doping).  I realize this may have been geared more towards younger and developing players fine-tuning their games, but one of my thoughts was Federer and the French Open.

Mailbag: Wawrinka's one-hand backhand, Nick Saviano, more mail