Hewitt, Clijsters: Not so different
When Lleyton Hewitt and Kim Clijsters were engaged way-back-when, to many it seemed like an odd pairing. No way does match.com yoke these two. He was the combative No. 1, who relished the battle and compensated for an absence of height with oversized heart, spleen and guts.
She, on the other hand, was powerfully built, a charter member of the WTA power brigade, but also sweet enough to cause tooth decay. Her inability to summon contempt, to make enemies (real or imagined), to cultivate a Hewittian taste for combat kept expressing herself in big events.
Now, many years since their split, well, they don't seem so different. Here they are, both in the sunset years of their Hall of Fame careers -- both married and with kids -- fighting like hell, savoring what could be a farewell tour, using experience and guile to mask injury and age.
On Saturday, Hewitt fired up one for the memory banks, simply outbattling Milos Raonic in four sets. It was vintage Hewitt, taking a match he had little business taking. Raonic is younger, stronger, healthier, and higher-ranked -- a player whose career vectors are all headed in the right direction. Raonic, though, lacks Hewitt's experience and his war record.
So when Hewitt stared down Raonic at a changeover, the Canadian wasn't sure how to react. When Raonic found a groove, Hewitt adjusted speeds and meters and ruined the rhythm. When the big moments surfaced, Raonic wasn't quite sure how to answer the questions. Hewitt did.
Finally, after three hours of courageous play, Hewitt finished off the match. He promptly fell on his back and looked at the Melbourne sky. "I always liked him, his spirit of competition," said Rafael Nadal, who watched the match at the hotel. "He is an example for a lot of people to follow."
So is Clijsters. She is the defending champion here but her last 12 months have been shredded by injuries that caused her expulsion from the top 10. On Sunday it looked she had suffered more misfortune when she turned her left ankle at 3-3 in the first set against Li Na.
She agonized (as did fans who saw the replay) but taped it up and resumed playing. This was a major, she said, and they would have to wheel her off the court. So she soldiered on, shortening points and picking her spots. There was nothing sweet or congenial. This was a veteran battling. "Maybe with the adrenaline I could just fly through it," she said. "At some point you think, 'OK, I'm going to go for it.'"
Her mobility -- a cornerstone of her game -- badly compromised, Clijsters lost the first set and then faced four match points. She wasn't done battling. She hung in rallies, changed the pace and, benefitting from some weak-kneed play from her opponent, leveled the match. Sensing correctly that Li was in a world of emotional hurt, she jumped to a 5-1 third-set lead and served out what might have the best match of the first week, 4-6, 7-6, 6-4.
Again and again, both Hewitt and Clijsters have been asked -- sometimes more subtly than others -- "Why are you still out there?" This weekend, both gave eloquent answers.
• It was just a really inept piece of officiating. And I suspect we haven't heard the last of it. Just to clarify: A) Isner is off the hook, an innocent bystander who even encouraged Nalbandian to challenge. B) Nalbandian threw the water (allegedly) at a tournament official, not at Kader Nouni. C) This supports Mary Carillo's contention that if replay exists, stop the "game show aspect" and the issuing "challenges" and simply use it to eliminate error.
• I need Joel Drucker here for the precise details. But there's a great story about Jimmy Connors. At Wimbledon one year, early in the match an opponent got a bum call and Connors offered to concede the point. The opponent declined on these grounds: "I know you, Connors. When it's 4-4 in the fifth set, you're going to come looking for payback."
• A) There is a world of difference between an exhibition -- with a set time, a set opponent, no ranking points at stake, no match the following day and, frankly, little incentive to win -- with a tournament. So I don't find it hypocritical that players complaining about the schedule play these one-night-only shows.
B) Who said anything about the United States? They play exos everywhere and the trend will only accelerate as tennis' nerve center continues moving toward Europe and Asia. Here's Victoria Azarenka the other day:
Q. Where did you do the work in the offseason?
VICTORIA AZARENKA: I went quite a few places actually. I've been to Monaco. I've been to Barbados. I played an exhibition there. I've been to Dubai. I played another exhibition in Thailand.
• Go ahead and feel free to disagree with Patrick McEnroe here. But he is entitled to an opinion despite never reaching No. 1. This notion -- and athletes are the worst culprits -- that you've forfeited your right to an opinion because "you don't know what it's like" is a fallacy.
You can like or dislike a meal without being a Michelin-starred chef. You're allowed to dislike a movie even if you have no imdb credits to your name. Pat McEnroe can condemn Wozniacki even if his playing career paled in comparison to hers.
• You willing to fly down here?
• Consider it called. I'll take Serbia.
• Fair point.
• Well, said, Ms. King, er, not Ms. King. As you walk the ground and see that the average WTA player has the requisite size to play in the WNBA, you come away with added respect for the undersized cohort that has to neutralize power and go into most matches knowing they will be the "dictatee" as it were.
Today's random encounter:
Five random observations from Sunday:
• Rafael Nadal effusively praised both Bernard Tomic and Milos Raonic, deeming them both future stars. One wonders: where would those two be if Nadal's two-year ranking was adopted?
• The player with the biggest entourage? My shekels are on Lleyton Hewitt. I've been to St. Patrick's Day parades with smaller crowds.
• Had a chance to sit down with Aggie Radwanska who was, in a word, delightful. For the first time in 17 years she is without her father as coach. She is in the quarters. Coincidence?
• Martina Navratilova playing on Margaret Court Arena was intriguing. But the television networks have clearly taken a don't-go-there attitude. As for the tennis, Martina Navratilova outperformed Martina Hingis.
• Favorite mixed doubles team: Kei Nishikori (b. 1989) and Kimiko Datr Krumm (b. 1970)
• GS of Calif.: Best comment yet from the AO -- Australian commentator for the Nadal-Lopez match, as Nadal tugs his shorts: "He should talk to Australia's Pat Rafter about comfy underwear." :-) How can you not love the Aussies!
• Press release: Tennis Channel will celebrate the remarkable career of Australia's greatest player -- Rod "The Rockhampton Rocket" Laver -- with
• Quinn Sutherland has Lookalikes: