In his latest Mock Draft, SI.com's Chris Burke takes a look at what happens if the 49ers don't take Jared Goff at No. 7, and also discusses some scenarios for a potential trade of the No. 1 pick.
Get all of Chris Burke’s columns as soon as they’re published. Download the new Sports Illustrated app (iOS or Android) and personalize your experience by following your favorite teams and SI writers.
“I think having the No. 1 overall pick gives us options,” Titans GM Jon Robinson said in February. “We certainly don’t want to be in this position next year. But we would like to capitalize on it and try to make an impact on the roster, whether we pick an impact player or whether we acquire more picks via trade.”
Which will it be?
The answer depends on what a team might be willing to offer to land the No. 1 pick. With that in mind, before jumping into this week’s mock, let’s take a look at what the other teams in the top 10 (plus Los Angeles) might be thinking regarding the draft’s top spot ... and what it would take to land it.
Cleveland Browns: Why would the Browns make the move up to No. 1? To prevent another team from having the chance. Say Cleveland is 100% locked in on one (but not both) of Carson Wentz or Jared Goff. With teams like San Francisco and Los Angeles lurking, the only way to ensure that the Titans don’t dump their pick elsewhere—a move that would likely take a QB off the board before the Browns pick—is to jump from 2 to 1. Probably a long shot ... but possible. Here's how that trade would look:
Browns get: Nos. 1 and 64, take Carson Wentz
Titans get: Nos. 2 and 32, plus a 2017 third, take Laremy Tunsil
San Diego Chargers: As with most teams in the top 10, the more likely play here is a trade down. If Laremy Tunsil or Jalen Ramsey gets to No. 3, the Chargers may choose to stay put and pick (Myles Jack, DeForest Buckner and Joey Bosa also could have that impact). There is not any one specific fit that would point to a move from that third slot up to the top.
Chargers get: No. 1, take Laremy Tunsil
Titans get: Nos. 3 and 35 plus a 2017 third, take Jalen Ramsey
Dallas Cowboys: Never count out Jerry Jones. The Cowboys appear to be sitting in a decent spot at No 4, though, where they will have a shot at at least two of Ramsey, Jack, Buckner, Bosa and Ezekiel Elliott. And there also is the possibility that Dallas could use its fourth pick on Wentz, Goff or even Paxton Lynch as future replacement for Tony Romo. Given all those choices, it would be stunning if the Cowboys made a move with Tennessee.
Cowboys get: No. 1, take Carson Wentz
Titans get: Nos. 4 and 34 plus a 2017 second, take Myles Jack
Jacksonville Jaguars: In a previous mock, I pitched a scenario that had Jacksonville trading up with San Diego to ensure it landed Ramsey, Jack or Bosa. (Buckner is an option, too, but I’d rank him below that trio when it comes to fitting the Jaguars’ defense). If Cleveland does not go with a QB at No. 2, there is a very realistic chance that at least three of the top four picks are defensive players. Such an outcome would leave the Jaguars choosing between players they don’t need (QBs, RBs, arguably OTs), reaching a bit on an edge player (Shaq Lawson) or cornerback (Vernon Hargreaves) or drafting a prospect in Buckner whose role would be very similar to that of high-priced free agent Malik Jackson. Rather than cross their fingers, the Jaguars could get aggressive.
Jaguars get: No. 1, take Jalen Ramsey
Titans get: Nos. 5 and 38 plus a 2017 second, take DeForest Buckner
Baltimore Ravens: The Jaguars’ pick at No. 5 is where I would draw a line in terms of trade value for the Titans—any team from No. 6 down wanting that top pick probably would have to surrender a 2017 first-rounder, as well. Perhaps the Jaguars also would, but there at least is a perceived appeal to staying in the top five. With that in mind, it's tough to envision a Ravens front office that places an emphasis on pick volume coughing up multiple first-rounders to get on the No. 1 line. Consider it far more likely that Baltimore: a) moves up a spot or two, if it sets its sights on a defender; or b) trades out of the top 10.
Ravens get: No. 1, take Laremy Tunsil
Titans get: Nos. 6 plus a 2017 first, take DeForest Buckner
San Francisco 49ers: An obvious candidate to trade up, at least if we’re assuming that Colin Kaepernick winds up in Denver. Should that happen, the 49ers could set their sights on taking a QB in Round 1, and waiting until pick No. 7 would be excruciating. Giving up multiple first-round picks is a painful thought for any franchise, but if a gamble like that brings in a franchise quarterback, it’s worth it.
49ers get: Nos. 1 and 140, take Jared Goff
Titans get: Nos. 7 and 68 plus a 2017 first, take Ronnie Stanley
Philadelphia Eagles: From 13 to 8 to 1? The Eagles would be in unprecedented territory if they pulled off that sequence. Given that they do not have a second-round pick this year, the odds are better that they go from 13 to 8 to ... somewhere back out of the top 10, trading down to recoup their missing Round 2 selection. That said, The MMQB’s Peter King speculated this week that Philadelphia could actually be the team to chase Tennessee’s spot up top, perhaps for one of those aforementioned quarterbacks. Sam Bradford’s 2017 cap hit ($22.5 million) makes him a likely cut, presuming he does not earn his way into a long-term extension; Chase Daniel’s $21 million deal can all but come off the books ($1 million guaranteed) for the 2018 season.
Eagles get: No. 1 and 140, take Jared Goff
Titans get: Nos. 8, 77, 100 plus a 2017 first, take Ronnie Stanley
Tampa Bay Buccaneers: The Buccaneers obviously do not need a quarterback, but they desperately could use some help in the secondary. Enter Ramsey as a possible carrot dangling out in front of their Round 1 plans. The price tag to trade from No. 9 to No. 1 would be massive, so the Bucs’ front office would have to be fully convinced that Ramsey not only would bring an immediate impact to their defense but is, respective to the other names that could be there at 9, a significant step up. Perhaps it is...but I still don’t see this one happening.
Buccaneers get: No. 1, take Jalen Ramsey
Titans get: Nos. 9 and 39 plus a 2017 first, take Vernon Hargreaves
New York Giants: Even in the midst of an off-season that has seen GM Jerry Reese throw caution to the wind, trading up to No. 1 would be a bit cuckoo bananas. Yes, Tunsil, Ramsey or Jack would all stand as significant upgrades to New York's current roster—Tunsil could kick 2015 first-rounder Ereck Flowers to the right side; Ramsey could slot in either at CB or as Landon Collins’s running mate at safety; Jack brings a level of athleticism to the linebacker spot that is nonexistent among those currently there. But it would cost the Giants a small fortune.
Giants get: No. 1, take Laremy Tunsil
Titans get: Nos. 10 and 40, plus a 2017 first and third, take Shaq Lawson
Bonus! Los Angeles Rams: The Rams were on the other side of the coin when they flipped pick No. 2 to Washington for three first-rounders (including No. 6 that year) and a second-rounder. If the price tag to get to No. 1 this year is in a similar ballpark, Tennessee probably can just go ahead and pick. The buzz on the 2016 quarterbacks in general does not match the Andrew Luck-Robert Griffin III fervor. Should Los Angeles have hope of a 14-spot jump, it would have to believe its three top-50 picks this year at least could get the ball rolling. How desperate is this franchise for a new quarterback?
Rams get: No. 1, take Jared Goff
Titans get: Nos. 15, 43 and 45, plus a 2017 first and third, take Jack Conklin
The above scenarios all revolve around a potential trade of the No. 1 pick. This week’s mock does keep every team in its designated Round 1 spot, but there are some other major shifts.
In past weeks, I’ve sent a quarterback (Goff) to San Francisco at No. 7. While that is entirely possible, locking in on it at this point seems premature—the 49ers still have Colin Kaepernick, for one, but also seem to like Blaine Gabbert and have ample needs at other spots. Swapping out Goff at No. 7 for a different player sends ripples through the rest of Round 1.
The same theory came to mind at a handful of other spots in the bottom half, like Philadelphia, Detroit, Indianapolis, Buffalo and Washington. Past mocks have focused on one or two specific players or positions for those teams, but what if those lines of thinking were way off base?
Here's the latest mock: