Skip to main content

Jimmy Garoppolo Trade Won't Save Browns in 2022, Hurts them in 2023 Through 2026

As the Cleveland Browns face the possibility of a lost season due to Deshaun Watson's suspension, many are advocating for a trade to acquire Jimmy Garoppolo, a quarterback that won't save them this year and would actually hurt their ability to operate in the future.
  • Author:
  • Publish date:

The worst thing the Cleveland Browns can do is try to "save" the 2022 season by trading for Jimmy Garoppolo, the modern incarnation of Neil O'Donnell. Garoppolo is not good enough and any short term payoff comes with long term consequences. If the Browns wanted to have a better quarterback to play while Deshaun Watson was suspended, they should've worked harder to salvage their relationship with projected week one opponent, Baker Mayfield.

Even if the San Francisco 49ers were willing to give the Browns Garoppolo for nothing to avoid him going to the Seattle Seahawks, the salary he's due goes against everything the Browns have been prioritizing this offseason. They have actively signed players to extensions and held back on going after veterans entirely for the sake of their salary cap so they can roll as much over as possible so they can keep this core together for the next four to five years.

Garoppolo is set to earn $24.2 million in salary this season, $7.6 million more than the Browns were set to pay Mayfield this year and the Browns still had to eat $10.5 million of Mayfield's salary. If Garoppolo gets his entire salary, the Browns will lose out on $48.4 million in adjusted salary cap next year, which will not only limit what the Browns could pay prospective free agents, including their own like Jadeveon Clowney, but also carry over into 2024 through 2026, the years Watson, Myles Garrett, Denzel Ward, David Njoku, Joel Bitonio and Wyatt Teller are all under contract.

If the Browns weren't willing to go out and add another veteran receiver among other positions that could help the Watson-led Browns be more competitive in 2022 due to concerns over his availability, why would they use that money for a mediocre interim passer?

The Browns were always prepared for the possibility the 2022 season was going to be a lost season. It was baked into the trade of Watson with the knowledge of a looming suspension. They will try to win as many games as possible with what they have, but gain nothing in using extra money and draft capital this year to maybe squeak into the playoffs in a loaded conference. Acquiring Garoppolo doesn't guarantee the Browns anything. They could still miss the playoffs, which would only magnify the folly of such a trade.

When the Browns made the move for Watson, they made the Super Bowl the expectation for his tenure in Cleveland. The Browns were willing to potentially sacrifice the 2022 season if it meant at least four years of having a stacked team that could go the distance.

The money they don't use on Garoppolo in 2022 could be rolled over to potentially add more weapons for Watson or address other areas of concern when he's available for a full season and is more prepared to play like a franchise quarterback.

The only way the Browns should even consider Garoppolo is if the 49ers cut him and he's willing to play for practically nothing. Short of that, the Browns can fall short of the postseason without adding an expensive game manager with a reputation of being soft. When it comes to understanding how the Browns will operate, always follow the money.