Skip to main content

Zeke Responds To RB Ranking: 'I've Dominated; Respect My Name'

Where NFL 'Experts' Rank Ezekiel Elliott Among The NFL Running Backs Has The Dallas Cowboys Star Lashing Out

FRISCO - A media outlet's talent survey of NFL league executives, coaches, scouts and players is trying to rank the top players by position. The good news for Ezekiel Elliott? He apparently came in as a top-three running back.

The bad news for Ezekiel Elliott? One NFL offensive coach ranked Elliott as the 11th-best back in the NFL, saying, "Very few breakout runs, doesn't look as strong anymore. Feels like he's about 60 to 70 percent of what he was."

Maybe that's why Elliott on Thursday morning is taking to Twitter to defend his record. In a series of tweets, Elliott writes:

"Check the stats. Since I entered this league I have dominated year in, year out. Put some RESPECT on my name. ...

"There are a lot of great backs in this league but I don’t understand why the media has to talk down on my game just to uplift other backs. We all are talented football players and can ball. ...

"Almost 1800 scrimmage yards and 14 TD’s with no training camp and now I'm not the same back.''

No image description

Mike-McCarthy-Bizarre-Monkey-Butt-Motivational-Tactics-Left-Lasting-Impression-Jerry-Jones
Play

'Charlie F**k-Around': Is Cowboys Nation Right to Lose Faith in Coach Mike McCarthy?

Critics are clamoring for a change after Dallas' epic Wild Card meltdown

dak sad
Play

'I'm Sorry': Dak Prescott Apologizes for Supporting Cowboys Fans Assault on Referees

"I deeply regret the comments I made regarding the officials after the game on Sunday,'' Prescott writes on social media.

dak madden az 1
Play

'I'm Sorry': Dak Prescott Offers Apology for Supporting Cowboys Fans Assault on Referees

Dak Prescott's comments can be excused as heat-of-the-moment hot takes, and will be defused - as an apology should've been forthcoming - and now has been delivered.

As you know if you are familiar with this space: These lists range from somewhere around "subjective'' to somewhere around "arbitrary.'' ESPN says it "ranked candidates based on number of top-10 votes, composite average, interviews and research. We had several ties, so we broke them by isolating the two-man matchup with additional voting and follow-up calls.''

It's a legitimate endeavor with obvious flaws. And its own non-paywall revelation essentially admits that. ESPN writes, "The game's best running backs can be separated into tiers, each of which has incredibly close arguments for who's better. The top three - Saquon Barkley, Christian McCaffrey and Elliott - traded 1-2-3 spots throughout the process.

We are left to assume, based on that paragraph, that some of the voters considered two-time NFL rushing champion Elliott to be the No. 1 running back in the game, and the consensus (the result of number of top-10 votes, composite average, interviews and research - and by the way, we're not sure what "interviews and research'' have to do with voters' votes, but oh well) has him at No. 3.

We are also left to assume that this is the specific piece that Elliott objects to - though certainly, it is at least this sort of piece that has raised his ire.

But one guy views him as No. 11? This is where "science'' veers into "subjectivity'' ... maybe even something less reliable than that.

Wrote Elliott: "Women lie. Men lie. The stats don’t. Go do your homework.''