Quickly

  • How teams across the league are re-assessing small running backs and receivers, and why size is less of an issue than ever in the NFL.
By Conor Orr
April 09, 2019

Life has a way of reminding Penny Hart that he’s five feet, eight inches tall.

There was that time he scored nine touchdowns in his finale at King's Ridge Christian high school and when he told people—good friends, even—they didn’t believe him. More recently, there was the non-invite to the scouting combine in February despite a couple of 1,000-yard receiving seasons at Georgia State and an impressive week at the Senior Bowl.

But much higher up on the cruel universe scale, was that week at the Senior Bowl in Mobile, when Hart, the smallest prospect at the game, found out his roommate would be Donald Parham, the Stetson tight end who, at 6' 8", was the tallest player at the all-star event.

“We’re walking out of the elevator together and everyone is looking at us, side-eyed and grinning,” Hart said.

Hart had more than 200 catches and 20 TDs in his Georgia State career.

Todd Bennett/Getty Images (2)

This time of year, and this time in his life, is especially grating as he prepares for the NFL draft. In scouting parlance, Hart is considered an “exception” player; a guy who falls outside of the height and weight standards teams usually align their grading scale with. For some coaches and general managers, being outside that scale slices them off the board entirely. For others, it places him into a separate bin of players they’ll sample, but don’t want too many of.

“Think, if I was like 5' 11", this would be a completely different story,” Hart said. “The game isn’t made for smaller guys. But it makes me realize how much hard work I put in just to fight the politics. It’s tough. They’ll see you doing your thing, then maybe someone 6' 2" isn’t coming out of their breaks as well, and teams are like ‘Um, let’s just go get him.’”

But at all levels of football, smart coaches are finding ways to get their best athletes the ball faster and with more room to run than ever before. As one college defensive coordinator put it: The game once played at the width of an office desk is now expanding to swallow the entire football field. And as the field has opened up, gradually, so have opportunities for players like Hart.


Last year, our Jenny Vrentas reported that at least one major scouting service began averaging the heights of successful quarterbacks into their data range, making players like Russell Wilson and Baker Mayfield no longer outliers. In subsequent months, there has been legitimate discussion surrounding a team selecting 5' 10" Kyler Murray with the No. 1 overall pick. Their revolution, it seems, is fully on.

As for running backs and receivers, the pace of change is more incremental. A deep dive into draft data for all 32 general managers shows some teams clinging steadfast to their ideal ranges for height, arm length, weight and hand size. But make no mistake: Even at the pace the league is headed now, those numbers will look drastically different five years from now.

“It changes marginally every year,” Falcons general manager Thomas Dimitroff said. “It’s a big part of our analysis every year and our statistical approach to make sure we’re always up on that. We’re not using charts from 10 years ago. Things are changing in this league, and it’s ever-evolving, of course.”

A sampling of general managers at this year’s scouting combine reveal a few different thoughts on size regiments for NFL prospects.

• They allow themselves exceptions, but only after a certain round.

• They have one and remain mostly attached to that scale, grading exception players in a way that would make it difficult for them to surface as “draftable” on their board.

• They have a vague idea of an ideal size, but, like Dimitroff, allow that to change based on league-wide trends.

In 2018, the Texans drafted the first receiver of the Brian Gaine era (including the time he was the team’s director of player personnel) who was under six feet, 185 pounds and had shorter than 30-inch arms (WR Keke Coutee). Gaine considers himself a traditionalist, but with a caveat.

“What happens is, as a staff, you have your standards, your dimensions of what you want,” Gaine said. “Then there’s going to be exception players. And when they’re exception players they have to be exceptional at something and it’s that delicate balance between ‘Alright, this is what I want him to look like, but he’s a highly productive guy.”

While admitting that he’s trying to make guys “as prototypical as can be,” his theory is an interesting take on the old scouting axiom, which basically says, If you take too many exception players, you just end up with a roster full of exceptions. Instead, Gaine said, you’re drawn to what helps the team win. If you find yourself arriving at a similar place time and time again that is outside your established norm, maybe that’s the kind of player you’ve actually been looking for all along.

“That’s what we all navigate in the scouting community,” Gaine said. “He might not have X, Y or Z, but you mix into it D and F.”

Chiefs general manager Brett Veach said he “kind of has a thing” for “220-pound backs that can run and catch and block,” which has held mostly true since he joined the organization in 2013. Excluding De’Anthony Thomas (2014), who was converted to receiver, the two running backs the Chiefs have drafted, Kareem Hunt and Knile Davis, were 5' 10" 216 pounds and 5' 10", 227, respectively.

That precision seems to have extended to the wide receiver position, where all but one of the receivers drafted during the Veach/John Dorsey era were between six feet and 6' 3", with arm lengths between 32 and 3334inches and hand sizes between 9.1 and 10.2 inches.

They are also the team that drafted the 5' 10" Tyreek Hill in the fifth round in 2016, which helped further the narrative that, in the right offense, there were players who could do serious damage even if they couldn’t outmuscle traditionally sized defensive backs. (Hill’s guilty plea to a domestic violence charge played a major role in him being available that late, but the sentiment regarding his size and speed was not lost on teams.)

“My philosophy is that in your primary rounds, you have to just maintain consistency,” Veach said. “When you get later in the draft, sometimes you just let the tape speak for itself and if a guy can play, he can play. Not to say you won't break those trends earlier on, but I think just in general you just want to maintain the kind of standards you have set, certain height, weight speed, all those kind of things early on.

“But every year's different, and there's always a unique player that will break that philosophy.”

The common thread was that late hedge. Yes we have ideal sizes, but… You want them to look a certain way, except when... If there was a perfect way to capture the state of change, it was there. It is safe to say these conversations are taking place more frequently in draft rooms and in scouting circles.

“We have those discussions all the time with not only our analytics department but our pro personnel department,” Dimitroff said. “Scott Pioli, Joel Collier, Steve Sabo—our college director [of scouting]—we have a lot of discussions with where we’re going and Dan and I spend a lot of time talking about it. We want to make sure that those heights, weights and speeds, and the numbers attributed to a certain player are what we’re looking for from our scheme standpoint.”


There was relief for Andy Isabella, the 5' 9", 188-pound receiver out of UMass, when he made it an entire week with the Raiders coaching staff during the Senior Bowl without being asked about life at one end of the size curve.

While a sampling of scouts did ask him practical height questions during the week—most notably, “How are you going to handle bigger, stronger defensive backs in the NFL?” Isabella was prepared with a stock answer he had solidified over time.

“I don’t really like explaining how I’m going to do things,” Isabella said. “So it’s like, I guess go watch me do it.”

Isabella at the Senior Bowl.

Don Juan Moore/Getty Images

The emotional payoff came in the form of an on-field meeting with 49ers receivers coach Wes Welker, the godfather of modern-day, norm-shattering undersized receivers. Isabella got the subtle nod and a “Hey, I love your game.” When recreating the conversation by phone, he included the proper tone hike in his voice, when he returned pleasantries: “I love your game!”

He was fortunate in that, like Welker, he was paired with a head coach in college that many in the industry had long revered as a mad scientist type. For Mark Whipple, Isabella’s head coach at UMass and now the offensive coordinator at the University of Pittsburgh, Isabella’s size just became another variable in the coach’s obsession to get the ball to his fastest player in space—a concept that seems simple to us now, but took years of solidified proof before many would dabble with the idea.

That included 15 new plays per week (Whipple almost always utilized rolling playbooks that changed with each opponent) with a few standards that accentuated his textbook quickness on double-move routes.

“He would put me in the backfield and just call Izzy [as in Isabella] right, or Izzy Left, Izzy Spear,” Isabella said. “The plays were named after me, so that was kind of cool. But we used all different types of motions and stuff.”

Hearing Isabella and Hart walk you through the intricacies of their route running process, it’s clear that the inherent advantage in drafting a smaller wideout is that, so often, they felt the need to be better at everything else, because the assumption is that they cannot win routes in a typical fashion (even if they can). Hart’s dad always told him that his only responsibility in football was to create a game with no weakness (no pressure).

And still, the recognition comes masked in sarcasm. Like Isabella said, “almost everyone I talk to” says that, at the least, he can catch on with the Patriots as a short, fast, white guy.

Until players of their distinction have their Kyler Murray moment, they’ll be here, training, snapping off their routes and shaving milliseconds off their 40 time for a chance into the NFL’s backdoor, politely answering questions about things they can’t control.

• Question or comment? Email us at talkback@themmqb.com.

You May Like

HOLE YARDS PAR R1 R2 R3 R4
OUT
HOLE YARDS PAR R1 R2 R3 R4
IN
Eagle (-2)
Birdie (-1)
Bogey (+1)
Double Bogey (+2)