NBA Big Board 5.0: Joel Embiid center of attention

Let's be clear: Embiid's back injury isn't raising red flags among NBA executives -- yet. Several executives with likely lottery picks told SI.com that they will wait to get a closer look at Embiid's medicals before moving him down on their boards. For now, they still see Embiid as a strong defender with high-level physical tools and the form and footwork to develop into an elite two-way center.

Parker has proved to be a prolific college scorer (19.1 points per game), a strong rebounder (8.7) and a developing three-point shooter (35.8 percent). His defensive problems against Mercer were a high-profile reminder of Parker's biggest question marks. Teams still aren't sure which forward position Parker will play in the NBA -- or if he can defend either one. Still, a strong-scoring/weak-defending forward can thrive in the NBA. Right, Carmelo?

Randle has drawn comparisons to a more athletic Zach Randolph, Michael Beasley and even Derrick Coleman. Scouts wish Randle was more consistent, but back-to-back strong games in the tournament (32 points, 25 rebounds in Kentucky's first two wins) are a reminder that when he's on, the freshman is a dynamic post player and a rugged rebounder. His wingspan -- just 6-11 -- will likely be dissected at the combine, but the offensive talent will be hard to overlook.

Exum has been working out in Los Angeles in preparation for the draft. There have been reports that Exum, who is represented by Kobe Bryant's agent, Rob Pelinka, may be angling for the Lakers to draft him. But two executives from lottery teams said that wouldn't stop them from drafting Exum if he's available. Scouts rave about the Australian's natural talent. Exum can play both guard spots, but his long-term future is likely at shooting guard.

Vonleh -- who has already decided to enter the draft -- didn't exactly dazzle in his final few weeks at Indiana. He missed two games with a foot injury, struggled against tournament-bound teams Iowa (four points, five rebounds) and Michigan (seven points, eight rebounds) and chipped in just six points and five rebounds in a season-ending loss to Illinois. Vonleh has a strong base and is a rugged rebounder, but his offensive game remains extremely limited.

Ennis announced this week that he'll be turning pro, and he should be in the mix to be the first point guard off the board. Ennis finished the season ranked in the top 30 nationally in assists (5.5 per game) and sixth in assist-to-turnover ratio. His strength in the pick-and-roll -- the NBA's bread-and-butter play that has become a must for every point guard -- is arguably Ennis' greatest asset.

When healthy, Harris is a terrific two-way player. He's strong off the dribble, can hit the mid-range shot and finishes at the rim. Defensively, Harris makes up for a (slight) lack of size with aggression and speed. The primary concern continues to be his three-point shot. He's a solid 4-of-11 from deep through two tournament games but has made just 35.2 percent for the season, down from 41.1 last year. The good news is his form isn't bad and scouts can see it developing over time.

ESPN.com's Chad Ford reported that Saric agreed to a three-year deal with Efes Pilsen of the Turkish Basketball League, which could keep him (again) out of the draft. Saric is having a terrific season for Croatia's KK Cibona, leading the Adriatic League in scoring and rebounding. Executives say he is physically stronger this year and has the polish to develop into a strong point forward.

Payne may be the most NBA-ready big man in the draft. At 6-10, 245 pounds, Payne has legitimate pro size, can space the floor (43.8 percent from three-point range) and bang on the glass (7.3). The knock on Payne: He's 23, and doesn't have the upside of some younger players at his position. Payne was brilliant in a 41-point, eight-rebound effort against Delaware in the second round of the tournament. He showcased the kind of skills that scouts would drool over if Payne were 19.

Stauskas continued his long-range sharpshooting by hitting 7-of-15 threes in tournament victories against Wofford and Texas. The Wolverine has a lightning-quick release and combines his shooting with an efficient off-the-dribble game. The issue is the other end of the floor, though. One scout called his defensive potential in the NBA "a nightmare," but if he can develop into a serviceable defender, Stauskas' offense will make him a serious weapon.

Young is erratic, and his defense is weaker than that of Harris, one of his primary rivals on the two-guard depth chart. But when he's on -- like he was in a 13-point, eight-rebound performance against Wichita State -- he's dangerous. Young has tinkered with his shooting technique through the season, and though it isn't flawless, it's improved. With solid size, Young has the potential to become a solid starter.

A lack of consistency has plagued Hairston, who had a six-point dud on March 6, a 29-point outburst on March 19 and a 10-point (on 5-of-17 shooting) stinker on March 20. Scouts are enamored of Hairston's size (6-6, 220 pounds) and scoring potential. If Hairston were producing like this at North Carolina (21 ppg) he would be a lock for the lottery. The draft combine could be big for Hairston to address teams' lingering questions about his character.

Hood's jump shot failed him during a 2-of-10 performance in Duke's season-ending loss to Mercer. Still, Hood shot 42 percent from three-point range this season. In recent weeks, scouts have been more vocal with their concerns about Hood's weaknesses -- ball handling, defense and mid-range game are chief among them -- which pushed him down this month's Board. But teams looking for shooting likely won't find a better option than Hood.

Warren is old school. He's an efficient, inside-the-three-point-line player with a pretty mid-range game and a knack for finishing through contact at the rim. It's rare NBA executives get excited about a swingman who can't shoot from deep (26.7 percent), but Warren is so strong in other areas that scouts are willing to overlook it. Warren is a minus defender, which could hurt him on draft night. But a team in the mid-to-late first round craving offense will snap him up.

Cauley-Stein is something of an enigma. He has tremendous defensive potential, with superior athleticism and timing that have made him a feared shot blocker (2.9 per game). He's solid on the glass, too, particularly on the offensive end. But offensively, there is not much there. Cauley-Stein could fall into the Mason Plumlee/Gorgui Dieng draft range, going to a team that can live with his offensive limitations.

Let the debate begin. Advocates for McDermott cite his diverse offensive game, developing step-back jump shot and three-point shot (44.9 percent, the fourth straight season it has been above 40 percent) that should easily be as effective in the NBA. Critics cite his lack of size and speed and wonder which position he will be able defend effectively. McDermott's best fit would seem to be a team that doesn't need him to be the focal point of an offense and can develop him slowly in a limited role.