Skip to main content
Giants Baseball Insider

Giants Should Make Defense the Tiebreaker at Second Base

Luis Arraez’s defensive improvement offered a useful benchmark as San Francisco weighed Marcelo Mayer, Casey Schmitt and its 2027 infield.
San Francisco Giants infielder Casey Schmitt.
San Francisco Giants infielder Casey Schmitt. | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

The San Francisco Giants should make defense the deciding factor at second base if Marcelo Mayer and Casey Schmitt project to provide similar offensive value.

The Giants already had evidence that the position could become a meaningful source of run prevention. Luis Arraez recorded 11 outs above average at second base during his time with the club in 2026, before adding one more with the Philadelphia Phillies.

An Oct. 24 McCovey Chronicles review renewed attention to that improvement. For San Francisco, the useful offseason lesson involved how to evaluate the players competing to replace those innings.

The decision should account for the entire job, including what happens when the ball is put in play.

Arráez Supplied a Defensive Benchmark

San Diego Padres center fielder Jackson Merrill (3) slides under San Francisco Giants second baseman Luis Arraez's tag.
San Diego Padres center fielder Jackson Merrill slides under San Francisco Giants second baseman Luis Arraez's tag. | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

Arraez’s Statcast record separated his work with each team, an important distinction when assessing his completed campaign.

His 12 outs above average represented the combined total. Eleven came with the Giants, where his improvement added value beyond his established contact skills.

The recent review also credited infield coach Ron Washington’s work. That reporting supported a reason to examine instruction and preparation, although one player’s results could not establish exactly how much credit belonged to any particular factor.

For the team, the next step should be practical. Identify which positioning choices, footwork adjustments and preparation routines helped, then determine which lessons applied to other infielders.

Mayer and Schmitt would have their own strengths and limitations. Expecting either to duplicate Arraez’s measured improvement would be an unsupported projection.

The better standard would be consistent execution: cover the expected ground, complete routine plays and give the pitching staff dependable support. Those skills should receive deliberate evaluation alongside the offensive projections.

Give the Competition a Clear Test

San Francisco Giants third baseman Casey Schmitt (10) catches a ball hit by the Toronto Blue Jays
San Francisco Giants infielder Casey Schmitt. | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

The Giants’ current Opening Day projection left second base open to further assessment. Health and any offseason trade would influence the eventual choices.

Once medically cleared, the candidates should receive enough work at the position for coaches to evaluate their movement, throws and double-play exchanges. The team should combine those observations with its defensive information.

Mayer’s positional background gave San Francisco options, but versatility should not prevent it from identifying where he could provide the most value.

Schmitt’s ability to handle other assignments also should be evaluated within the complete infield plan. Moving him elsewhere would require a dependable second baseman behind that decision.

The proposed tiebreaker applies when the overall offensive projections are close. It would not mean ignoring a substantial difference at the plate.

The Giants needed to improve their pitching this winter. Choosing a second baseman who converted more of the staff’s playable contact into outs would support that investment, giving this competition a consequence beyond which hitter won more spring at-bats.

Add us as a preferred source on Google